form20-f.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
 
 
o
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
OR
 
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the transition period from                          to                       
OR
 
o
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 Date of event requiring this shell company report:
 
Commission file number: 1-33373
 

 
CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Republic of The Marshall Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
3 Iassonos Street, Piraeus, 18537 Greece
+30 210 458 4950
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices and company contact person)
 

 
Ioannis E. Lazaridis, i.lazaridis@capitalpplp.com
(Name and Email of company contact person)
 
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common units representing limited partnership interests
Nasdaq Global Market

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
 
37,946,183 Common Units
774,411 General Partner Units
 
 
 
 

 

 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
 
YES o              NO x
 
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
YES o              NO x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
YES x              NO o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)
 
YES o            NO o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of “accelerated filer and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
 
U.S. GAAP x
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued o
Other o
 
by the International Accounting Standards Board
 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statements item the registrant has elected to follow.
 
ITEM 17 o               ITEM 18 o    
 
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
YES o              NO x
 
 



 
 
 

 
 
 
CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
Page
 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
ii
   
     
Not applicable
Not applicable
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not applicable
     
   
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not applicable
 
     
   
     
Not applicable
 
 
     
   


 
 
 
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This annual report on Form 20-F (the Annual Report) should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included herein.
 
Statements included in this Annual Report which are not historical facts (including statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are also forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business, financial condition and the markets in which we operate, and involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may, “could”, “should”, “would”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “forecast”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “propose”, “potential”, “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places and include statements with respect to, among other things:
 
      ●
expectations of our ability to make cash distributions on the units;
 
our future financial condition or results of operations and our future revenues and expenses, including revenues from profit sharing arrangements and required levels of reserves;
 
future levels of operating surplus and levels of distributions as well as our future cash distribution policy;
 
tanker market conditions and fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the markets in which we operate;
 
future charter hire rates and vessel values;
 
anticipated future acquisition of vessels from Capital Maritime & Trading Corp. (“Capital Maritime”) or from third parties;
 
anticipated chartering arrangements with Capital Maritime in the future;
 
our anticipated growth strategies;
 
our ability to access debt, credit and equity markets;
 
the ability of our customers to meet their obligations under the terms of our charter agreements, including the timely payment of the rates under the agreements;
 
the financial viability and sustainability of our customers;
 
the repayment of debt and settling of interest rate swaps, if any;
 
the effectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures and the ability of counterparties to our derivative contracts to fulfill their contractual obligations;
 
future refined product and crude oil prices and production;
 
planned capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund capital expenditures;
 
future supply of, and demand for, refined products and crude oil;
 
increases in domestic or worldwide oil consumption;
 
changes in interest rates;
 
changes in the funding costs due to our banks;
 
our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major refined product importers and exporters, major crude oil companies, and major commodity traders;
 
 
 
 
our ability to maximize the use of our vessels, including the re-deployment or disposition of vessels no longer under long-term time charter;
 
our ability to leverage to our advantage Capital Maritime’s relationships and reputation in the shipping industry;
 
our continued ability to enter into long-term, fixed-rate time charters with our charterers and to recharter our vessels as their existing charters expire;
 
obtaining tanker projects that we or Capital Maritime bid on;
 
changes in the supply of tanker vessels, including newbuildings or lower than anticipated scrapping of older vessels;
 
our ability to compete successfully for future chartering and newbuilding opportunities;
 
the expected changes to the regulatory requirements applicable to the oil transportation industry, including, without limitation, requirements adopted by international organizations or by individual countries or charterers and actions taken by regulatory authorities and governing such areas as safety and environmental compliance;
 
the expected cost of, and our ability to comply with, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as standard regulations imposed by our charterers applicable to our business;
 
our anticipated general and administrative expenses and our expenses under the management agreement and the administrative services agreement with Capital Ship Management Corp., a subsidiary of Capital Maritime (“Capital Ship Management”), and for reimbursement for fees and costs of Capital GP L.L.C., our general partner;
 
increases in costs and expenses under our management agreement following expiration and/or renewal of such agreement in connection with certain of our vessels;
 
increases in costs and expenses including but not limited to: crew wages, insurance, provisions, lube oil, bunkers, repairs, maintenance and general and administrative expenses;
 
the adequacy of our insurance arrangements;
 
the expected impact of heightened environmental and quality concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers;
 
the anticipated taxation of our partnership and distributions to our unitholders;
 
estimated future maintenance and replacement capital expenditures;
 
expected demand in the shipping sectors in which we operate in general and the demand for our medium range vessels in particular;
 
the expected lifespan of our vessels;
 
our ability to employ and retain key employees;
 
customers’ increasing emphasis on environmental and safety concerns;
 
expected financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions and other expansion opportunities;
 
anticipated funds for liquidity needs and the sufficiency of cash flows;
 
our ability to increase our distributions over time;
 
future sales of our units in the public market; and
 
our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations.
 
These and other forward-looking statements are made based upon managements current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed in Risk Factors.” The risks, uncertainties and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.
 
 
 
 
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement. You should carefully review and consider the various disclosures included in this Annual Report and in our other filings made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, prospects and results of operations.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I
 
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors.
 
Not Applicable.
 
Item 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.
 
Not Applicable.
 
Item 3.
Key Information.

A.   Selected Financial Data

We have derived the following selected historical financial and other data for the three years ending December 31, 2010,  from our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (the “Financial Statements”) respectively, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. The historical financial data presented for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report and are provided for comparison purposes only.
 
Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future. Specifically, the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are not comparable to our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Our initial public offering on April 3, 2007, and certain other transactions that occurred thereafter, including the delivery or acquisition of thirteen additional vessels, the exchange of two vessels, the new charters for our vessels, the agreement we entered into with Capital Ship Management for the provision of management and administrative services to our fleet for a fixed fee and certain new financing and interest rate swap arrangements we entered into, have affected our results of operations. Furthermore, for the year ended December 31, 2006, only eight of the vessels in our current fleet had been delivered to Capital Maritime and only two were in operation for the full year. Consequently, the below table should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The table should also be read together with Item 5A:—Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Our Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles after giving retroactive effect to the combination of entities under common control as described in Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to the Financial Statements included herein. All numbers are in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except numbers of units and earnings per unit.
 
 

 
   
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2010 (1)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2009 (1)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2008 (1)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2007 (1)
 
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2006 (1)
Income Statement Data:
                             
Revenues
  $ 113,562     $ 134,519     $ 147,617     $ 98,730     $ 33,976  
Revenues – related party
    11,030                          
Total revenues
    124,592       134,519       147,617       98,730       33,976  
Expenses:
                                       
Voyage expenses (2)
    7,009       3,993       5,981       6,238       3,103  
Vessel operating expenses—related–party (3)
    30,261       30,830       26,193       12,958       1,319  
Vessel operating expenses (3)
    1,034       2,204       5,682       7,894       6,891  
General and administrative expenses
    3,506       2,876       2,817       1,477        
Depreciation and amortization
    31,464       30,685       26,581       16,759       4,819  
                                         
Total operating expenses
    73,274       70,588       67,254       45,326       16,132  
                                         
Operating income
    51,318       63,931       80,363       53,404       17,844  
Interest expense and finance costs
    (33,259 )     (32,675 )     (26,631 )     (14,792 )     (6,510 )
Loss on interest rate swap agreement
                      (3,763 )      
Interest and other  income
    860       1,460       1,254       711       13  
Foreign currency gain/(loss), net
                      (56 )     (78 )
                                         
Net income
  $ 18,919     $ 32,716     $ 54,986     $ 35,504     $ 11,269  
                                         
Less:
                                       
Net income attributable to CMTC operations:
    983       3,491       4,219       13,933       11,269  
Partnership’s net income
    17,936       29,225       50,767       21,571        
General partners interest in our  net income
    359       584       13,485       431        
Limited partners interest in our net income
    17,577       28,641       37,282       21,140        
Net income allocable to limited partner  per (4):
                                       
Common unit (basic and diluted)
    0.54       1.15       1.56       1.11        
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted)
          1.17       1.50       0.70        
Total unit (basic and diluted)
    0.54       1.15       1.54       0.95        
Weighted–average units outstanding (basic and diluted):
                                       
Common units
    32,437,314       23,755,663       15,379,212       13,512,500        
Subordinated units
          1,061,488       8,805,522       8,805,522        
Total units
    32,437,314       24,817,151       24,184,734       22,318,022        
                                         
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
                                       
Vessels, net and under construction
  $ 707,339     $ 703,707     $ 750,815     $ 569,223     $ 262,972  
Total assets
    758,252       760,928       821,907       608,627       276,666  
Total partners’ capital / stockholders’ equity (6) (7)
    239,760       188,352       214,126       209,274       71,458  
Number of shares/units
    38,720,594       25,323,623       25,323,623       22,773,492       5,700  
Common units
    37,946,183       24,817,151       16,011,629       13,512,500        
Subordinated units (5)
                8,805,522       8,805,522        
General Partner units
    774,411       506,472       506,472       455,470        
Dividends declared per unit
  $ 1.09     $ 2.27     $ 1.62     $ 0.75        
                                         
Cash Flow Data:
                                       
Net cash provided by operating activities
    50,051       72,562       76,956       55,475       11,725  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (79,202 )     (55,770 )     (270,003 )     (335,696 )     (197,391 )
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities
    58,070       (56,389 )     216,277       298,901       186,898  
 
 
 
 

(1)
The amount of historical earnings per unit for:
 
a)
the year ended December 31, 2006,
 
b)
the period from January 1, 2007 to April 3, 2007 for the vessels in our fleet at the time of our initial public offering,
 
c)
the period from January 1, 2007 to September 23, 2007, March 26, 2008 and April 29, 2008 for the M/T Attikos, the  M/T Amore Mio II and the M/T Aristofanis, respectively,
 
d)
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the period from January 1, 2009 to April 6, 2009 and April 12, 2009 for the M/T Agamemnon II, and M/T Ayrton II respectively,
 
e)
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the period from January 1, 2010 to June 29, 2010 for the M/T Alkiviadis, and
 
f)
the period from April 13, 2009 to December 31, 2009 and from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2010 for the M/T Atrotos, giving retroactive impact to the number of common and subordinated units (and the 2% general partner interest) that were issued, is not presented in our selected historical financial data. We do not believe that a presentation of earnings per unit for these periods would be meaningful to our investors as the vessels comprising our current fleet were either under construction or operated as part of Capital Maritime’s fleet with different terms and conditions than those in place after their acquisition by us.
(2)
Vessel voyage expenses primarily consist of commissions, port expenses, canal dues and bunkers.
(3)
Since April 4, 2007, our vessel operating expenses have consisted primarily of management fees payable to Capital Ship Management Corp., our manager, who provides commercial and technical services such as crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, spares and lubricants, as well as administrative services pursuant to management and administrative services agreements.
(4)
On January 1, 2009, we adopted accounting guidance newly available at the time relating to the Application of the Two-Class Method and its application to Master Limited Partnerships which considers whether the incentive distributions of a master limited partnership represent a participating security when considered in the calculation of earnings per unit under the Two-Class Method. This guidance also considers whether the partnership agreement contains any contractual limitations concerning distributions to the incentive distribution rights that would impact the amount of earnings to allocate to the incentive distribution rights for each reporting period. According to the two class method, the portion of net income allocated to nonvested shares reduces the net income available to common unitholders.
(5)
Following the early termination of the subordination period on February 14, 2009, all of our 8,805,522 subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. Please read “Item 8: Financial InformationTermination of the Subordination Period” for additional information.
(6)
In February and August 2010 we successfully completed two equity offerings of 6,281,578 and 6,052,254 common units, which include the partial exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option of 481,578 and 552,254 common units, respectively. During the same periods we issued, in exchange for cash, 128,195 and 123,515 general partner units, respectively, to our General Partner in order for it to maintain its 2% interest in us.
(7)
On August 31, 2010, we issued either directly or through our general partner, 795,200 restricted units to the members of our board of directors, to all employees of our general partner, our manager, Capital Maritime and certain key affiliates and other eligible persons. Please read “Item 6E: Share OwnershipOmnibus Incentive Compensation Plan” and Note 13 (Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan) to our Financial Statements included herein for additional information.
 
B.   Capitalization and Indebtedness.
Not applicable.
 
C.   Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds.
 
Not applicable.
 
 
 
 
D.   Risk Factors
 
Some of the following risks relate principally to the countries and the industry in which we operate and the nature of our business in general. Although many of our business risks are comparable to those of a corporation engaged in a similar business would face, limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. In particular, if any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to pay distributions on our common units, the trading price of our common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
 
Risks Inherent in Our Business

The recent global economic downturn may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations as well as on our ability to recharter our vessels at favorable rates.

Oil has been one of the world’s primary energy sources for a number of decades. The global economic growth of previous years had a significant impact on the demand for oil and subsequently on the oil trade and shipping demand. However, the second half of 2008, the year 2009 and parts of 2010 were marked by a major economic slowdown which has had, and is expected to continue to have, a significant impact on world trade, including the oil trade. Demand for oil and refined petroleum products contracted sharply as a result of the global economic slowdown, which in combination with the diminished availability of trade credit, deteriorating international liquidity conditions and declining financial markets, led to decreased demand for tanker vessels, creating downward pressure on charter rates. This economic downturn also affected vessel values overall. Despite certain indications of recovery during 2010 and continual upward revisions of expected global oil demand growth for 2011, there has not been a material increase in demand for product tankers or in charter rates and global economic conditions remain fragile with significant uncertainty remaining with respect to recovery prospects, levels of recovery and long term effects. Such upward revisions are primarily based on increased demand from countries not part of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) such as China and India, and if economic growth in these countries slows global oil demand may be significantly affected. See “Item 4B: Business Overview—The International Product Tanker Industry”. If these global economic conditions persist we may not be able to operate our vessels profitably or employ our vessels at favorable charter rates as they come up for rechartering. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the market value of our vessels may cause us to recognize losses if any of our vessels are sold or if their values are impaired, and may affect our ability to comply with our loan covenants. A deterioration of the current economic and market conditions or a negative change in global economic conditions or the product tanker market is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions and comply with our loan covenants, as well as our future prospects and ability to grow our fleet.
 
Charter rates for tanker vessels are highly volatile and are currently near historically low levels and may further decrease in the future, which may adversely affect our earnings and ability to make cash distributions.

We currently charter two vessels in the spot charter market and the charters of seven of our 21 vessels are scheduled to expire during 2011. We may only be able to recharter these vessels at reduced or unprofitable rates as their current charters expire, or we may not be able to recharter these vessels at all. Throughout 2010 the period charter market was, and continues to be, at close to historically low levels throughout 2010 and the majority of our vessels which entered into new charters during this period were rechartered at rates lower than their original charters. In the event the current low rate environment continues and charterers do not display an increased interest in chartering vessels for longer periods at improved rates, we may not be able to obtain competitive rates for our vessels and our earnings may be adversely affected.
 
Alternatively, we may have to deploy these vessels in the spot market, which, although common in the tanker industry, is cyclical and highly volatile, with rates fluctuating significantly based upon demand for oil and oil products and tanker supply, amongst others. In the past, the spot charter market has also experienced periods when spot rates have declined below the operating cost of vessels. The successful operation of our vessels in the spot charter market depends upon, among other things, obtaining profitable spot charters and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for charters and time spent traveling unladen to pick up cargo. Furthermore, as charter rates for spot charters are fixed for a single voyage which may last up to several weeks, during periods in which spot charter rates are rising, we will generally experience delays in realizing the benefits from such increases.
 
The demand for period charters may not increase and the tanker charter market may not significantly recover over the next several months or may decline further. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to meet our obligations and to make cash distributions.
 
 
 
 
Changes in the oil markets could result in decreased demand for our vessels and services.

Demand for our vessels and services in transporting oil depends upon world and regional oil markets. Any decrease in shipments of refined petroleum products in those markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Historically, those markets have been volatile as a result of the many conditions and events that affect the price, production and transport of oil, including competition from alternative energy sources. In the long term, oil demand may be reduced by an increased reliance on alternative energy sources and/or a drive for increased efficiency in the use of oil as a result of environmental concerns or high oil prices. The recent global economic downturn has severely affected the world economy and the prospects for recovery, especially in the OECD countries, remain uncertain. Currently, growth for demand for oil products is mainly from developing countries such as China and India and a slowdown in these countries’ economies may severely affect global oil demand growth, and may result in protracted, reduced consumption of oil products and a decreased demand for our vessels and lower charter rates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
 
 
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to pay the quarterly distribution on our common units following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses.

We may not have sufficient cash available each quarter to pay the declared quarterly distribution per common unit following establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses. The amount of cash we can distribute on our common units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which may fluctuate based on numerous factors generally described under this “Risk Factors” heading, including, among other things:
 
 
the rates we obtain from our charters;
 
our ability to recharter our vessels at competitive rates as their current charters expire;
 
the ability of our customers to meet their obligations under the terms of the charter agreements, including the timely payment of the rates under the agreements;
 
the continued sustainability of our customers;
 
the level of additional revenues we generate from our profit sharing arrangements, if any;
 
the level of our operating costs, such as the cost of crews and insurance, following the expiration of our management agreement pursuant to which we pay a fixed daily fee for an initial term of approximately five years from the time we take delivery of each vessel, which includes the expenses for its next scheduled special or intermediate survey, as applicable, and related drydocking;
 
the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet and the timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled drydocking of our vessels;
 
the amount of extraordinary costs incurred by our manager while managing our vessels not covered under our fixed fee arrangement which we may have to reimburse our manager for;
 
delays in the delivery of any newbuildings we may contract to acquire and the beginning of payments under charters relating to those vessels;
 
demand for seaborne transportation of refined oil products and crude oil;
 
supply of product and crude oil tankers and specifically the number of newbuildings entering the world tanker fleet each year;
 
force majeure events;
 
prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions; and
 
the effect of governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our business.

The actual amounts of cash we will have available for distribution will also depend on other factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as:
 
 
  
the level of capital expenditures we make, including for maintaining vessels, building new vessels, acquiring existing vessels and complying with regulations;
 
our debt service requirements, including our obligation to pay increased interest costs in certain circumstances, and restrictions on distributions contained in our debt instruments;
 
our ability to comply with covenants under our credit facilities, including our ability to comply with certain ‘asset maintenance’ ratios;
 
our ability to service our debt and, when the non-amortizing period expires in as early as June 2012, to refinance our existing indebtedness or, in the event such indebtedness is not refinanced, our obligation to make principal payments under our credit facilities starting in September 2012;
 
interest rate fluctuations;
 
the cost of acquisitions, if any;
 
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
 
our ability to make working capital borrowings, including to pay distributions to unitholders; and
 
the amount of any cash reserves, including reserves for future maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, working capital and other matters, established by our board of directors in its discretion.

 
 
 
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our profit or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result of this and the other factors mentioned above, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses and may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.
 
The shipping industry is cyclical, which may lead to lower charter hire rates, defaults of our charterers and lower vessel values, resulting in decreased distributions to our unitholders.

The shipping industry is cyclical, which may result in volatility in charter hire rates and vessel values. We may not be able to successfully charter our vessels in the future or renew existing charters at the same or similar rates. Even if we manage to successfully charter our vessels in the future, our charterers may go bankrupt or fail to perform their obligations under the charter agreements, they may delay payments or suspend payments altogether, they may terminate the charter agreements prior to the agreed upon expiration date or they may attempt to re-negotiate the terms of the charters. If we are required to enter into a charter when charter hire rates are low, our results of operations and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders could be adversely affected.
 
In addition, the market value and charter hire rates of product and crude oil tankers can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:
 
  ●  
the supply for oil and oil products which is influenced by, amongst others:
 
 international economic activity;
 
geographic changes in oil production, processing and consumption;
 
oil price levels;
 
inventory policies of the major oil and oil trading companies;
 
competition from alternative sources of energy; and
 
strategic inventory policies of countries such as the United States, China and India.
the demand for oil and oil products;
regional availability of refining capacity;
prevailing economic conditions in the market in which the vessel trades;
availability of credit to charterers and traders in order to finance expenses associated with the relevant trades;
  ●  
regulatory change;
  ●  
lower levels of demand for the seaborne transportation of refined products and crude oil;
  ●  
increases in the supply of vessel capacity; and
  ●  
the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships, as a result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards, or otherwise.

From time to time, we expect to enter into agreements with Capital Maritime or other third parties to purchase additional newbuildings or other vessels (or interests in vessel-owning companies).  Between the time we enter into an agreement for such purchase and delivery of the vessel, the market value of similar vessels may decline.  The market value of vessels is influenced by the ability of buyers to access bank finance and equity capital and any disruptions to the market and the possible lack of adequate available finance may negatively affect such market values.  Despite a decline in market values we would still be required to purchase the vessel at the agreed-upon price.
 
If we sell a vessel at a time when the market value of our vessels has fallen, the sale may be at less than the vessel’s carrying amount, resulting in a loss. In addition, a decrease in the future charter rate and/or market value of our vessels could potentially result in an impairment charge. A decline in the market value of our vessels could also lead to a default under any prospective credit facility to which we become a party, affect our ability to refinance our existing credit facilities and/or limit our ability to obtain additional financing.
 
An over-supply of tanker vessel capacity may lead to reductions in charterhire rates, vessel values and profitability.

The market supply of tankers is affected by a number of factors such as demand for energy resources, oil and petroleum products, level of charterhire rates, as well as strong overall economic growth in parts of the world economy, including Asia, and has been increasing as a result of the delivery of substantial newbuilding orders over the last few years. Newbuildings were delivered in significant numbers starting at the beginning of 2006 and continued to be delivered in significant numbers through to 2010 and 2011. In addition, it is estimated by Clarkson Research Services Limited, Shipping Intelligence Weekly,that the newbuilding order book, which extends to 2014, equaled approximately 28% of the existing world tanker fleet and the order book may increase further in proportion to the existing fleet. If the capacity of new ships delivered exceeds the capacity of tankers being scrapped and lost, tanker capacity will increase. If the supply of tanker capacity increases and if the demand for tanker capacity does not increase correspondingly, charter rates and asset values could materially decline. If such a reduction occurs, we may only be able to recharter our vessels at reduced or unprofitable rates as their current charters expire, or we may not be able to charter these vessels at all. A reduction in charter rates and the value of our vessels may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
 
 
 
 
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels have recently increased in frequency, which could adversely affect our business.

Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea and in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Over the last several years, the frequency of piracy incidents has increased significantly, particularly in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and towards the Mozambique Canal in the North Indian Ocean. For example, in April 2010, the M/V Samho Dream, a tanker vessel not affiliated with us, was captured by pirates in the Indian Ocean off the Somali Coast while carrying crude oil estimated to be worth $170.0 million. The vessel was in waters not normally known to be high risk seas for pirate attacks and was only released in November 2010 reportedly following a ransom payment in an undisclosed amount. On January 15, 2011, the M/V Samho Jewelry, a tanker vessel not affiliated with us, was pirated off the coast of Oman and was released following military action on January 21, 2010. According to EUNAVFOR there are now approximately 29 vessels and 693 hostages being held by pirates off the coast of Somalia and the average duration any vessel is held has increased. .
 
If these piracy attacks result in regions in which our vessels are deployed being characterized by insurers as “war risk” zones, as the Gulf of Aden temporarily was in May 2008, or Joint War Committee (“JWC”) “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for insurance coverage for our vessels could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including costs which may be incurred to the extent we employ onboard security guards following consultation with regulatory authorities, could increase in such circumstances. While any use of guards would be intended to deter and prevent the hijacking of our vessels, it could also increase our risk of liability for death or injury to persons or damage to personal property. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions as well as resulting in increased costs and decreased cash flows to our customers impairing their ability to make payments to us under our charters.
 
We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, each quarter, our board of directors is required to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted.

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain, over the long term, the operating capacity of our fleet. These maintenance and replacement capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated with drydocking a vessel, modifying an existing vessel or acquiring a new vessel to the extent these expenditures are incurred to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet. These expenditures could increase as a result of changes in:
 
the cost of our labor and materials;
the cost and replacement life of suitable replacement vessels;
customer/market requirements;
increases in the size of our fleet;
the age of the vessels in our fleet;
charter rates in the market; and
governmental regulations, industry and maritime self-regulatory organization standards relating to safety, security or the environment.
 
Our significant maintenance and replacement capital expenditures will reduce the amount of cash we have available for distribution to our unitholders. Any costs associated with scheduled drydocking are included in a fixed daily fee per time chartered vessel, that we pay Capital Ship Management under a management agreement for an initial term of approximately five years from the time we take delivery of each vessel, which includes the expenses for its next scheduled special or intermediate survey, as applicable. In the event our management agreement, which is scheduled to expire (at the earliest) for seven of our vessels during 2011 and an additional four during 2012, , is not renewed or is materially amended, we may have to separately deduct estimated capital expenditures associated with drydocking from our operating surplus in addition to estimated replacement capital expenditures.
 
Our partnership agreement requires our board of directors to deduct estimated, rather than actual, maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus each quarter in an effort to reduce fluctuations in operating surplus. The amount of estimated capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by the conflicts committee at least once a year. In years when estimated capital expenditures are higher than actual capital expenditures, the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual capital expenditures were deducted from operating surplus. If our board of directors underestimates the appropriate level of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, we may have less cash available for distribution in future periods when actual capital expenditures exceed our previous estimates.
 
 
 
 
If the contraction of the global credit markets and the resulting volatility in the financial markets continues or worsens, it may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and on our ability to obtain bank financing and/or to access the capital markets for future debt or equity offerings. The restrictions imposed by our credit facilities may also limit our ability to access such financing, even if it is available. If we are unable to obtain financing or access the capital markets, we may be unable to complete any future purchases of vessels from Capital Maritime or from third parties, or pursue other potential growth opportunities.

Since 2008, a number of major financial institutions have experienced serious financial difficulties and, in some cases, have entered into bankruptcy proceedings or are in regulatory enforcement actions. These difficulties have resulted, in part, from declining markets for assets held by such institutions, particularly the reduction in the value of their mortgage and asset-backed securities portfolios. These difficulties have been compounded by financial turmoil affecting the world’s debt, credit and capital markets, and the general decline in the willingness by banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly in the shipping industry due to the historically low asset values of ships. Given these conditions, the ability of banks and credit institutions to finance new projects, including the acquisition of new vessels in the future, is uncertain. In addition, these difficulties may adversely affect the financial institutions that provide our credit facilities and may impair their ability to continue to perform under their financing obligations to us, which could have an impact on our ability to fund current and future obligations.
 
Furthermore, our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, as well as by the continuing adverse market conditions, including weakened demand for, and increased supply of, product tankers, resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions, weakness in the financial markets and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. The restrictions imposed by our credit facilities, including the obligation to comply with certain asset maintenance and other ratios, may further restrict our ability to access available financing. During 2010 we were successful in accessing the capital markets twice and issued 5,800,000 and 5,500,000 common units, respectively, the proceeds of which were used to expand our fleet and acquire two additional M/R product tankers, but continued access to the capital markets is not assured. If we are unable to obtain additional credit or draw down upon borrowing capacity, it may negatively impact our ability to fund current and future obligations. In addition, the severe deterioration in the banking and credit markets has resulted in potentially higher interest costs and overall limited availability of liquidity, which may further affect our ability to complete any future purchases of vessels from Capital Maritime or from third parties or to refinance our debt. Our failure to obtain the funds for necessary future capital expenditures and for the refinancing of our debt could also have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, our ability to grow and make cash distributions and could cause the market price of our common units to decline.
 
Disruptions in world financial markets and further governmental action in the United States and in other parts of the world could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and could cause the market price of our common units decline.

Since 2008, global financial markets have experienced extraordinary disruption and volatility following adverse changes in the global credit markets. The credit markets in the United States have experienced significant contraction, deleveraging and reduced liquidity, and governments around the world have taken highly significant measures in response to such events, including the enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in the United States, and may implement other significant responses in the future. Securities and futures markets and the credit markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and other requirements. The SEC, other regulators, self-regulatory organizations and exchanges have enacted temporary emergency regulations and may take other extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies and may affect permanent changes in law or interpretations of existing laws.  Any changes to securities, tax, environmental, or the laws of regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows and could cause the market price of our common units to decline.
 
A limited number of financial institutions hold our cash including financial institutions located in Greece.

A limited number of financial institutions, including institutions located in Greece, will hold all of our cash. Our bank accounts have been deposited from time to time with banks in Germany, United Kingdom, Norway and Greece amongst others. Of these financial institutions located in Greece, some are subsidiaries of international banks and others are Greek financial institutions. These balances are not covered by insurance in the event of default by these financial institutions. The occurrence of such a default could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and we may lose part or all of our cash that we deposit with such banks.
 
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining additional financing, pursuing other business opportunities and paying distributions to you. In the event we are not able to refinance our debt, following the end of the relevant non-amortizing periods we will need to make principal payments which may have a material adverse impact on our ability to make distributions.
 
 

 
We entered into a $370.0 million revolving credit facility on March 22, 2007, as amended, (the “2007 facility”), and a further $350.0 million revolving credit facility on March 19, 2008, as amended (the “2008 facility” and together with the 2007 facility, our “credit facilities”).  The 2007 facility is non-amortizing until June 2012 and the 2008 facility is non-amortizing until March 2013. As of December 31, 2010, we had drawn $366.5 million under the 2007 facility and $107.5 million under the 2008 facility, and had $3.5 and $242.5 million available, respectively. For more information regarding the terms of our credit facilities, please read “Item 5B: Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowings—Revolving Credit Facilities” below. In the future we may incur additional indebtedness, the level of which will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation, the following:
 
  
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired, or such financing may not be available on favorable terms;
  
we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make interest payments and, following the end of the relevant non-amortizing periods, principal payments on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations, future business opportunities and distributions to unitholders;
  
our debt level will make us more vulnerable to competitive pressures, or to a downturn in our business or in the economy in general, than our competitors with less debt; and
  
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions.

Our ability to service our debt and, when the non-amortizing period expires in as early as June 2012, to refinance our existing indebtedness or, in the event such indebtedness is not refinanced, our obligation to make principal payments under our credit facilities starting in September 2012, will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. In the event we are not able to refinance our existing debt obligations, or if our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, or to make relevant principal repayments if necessary, we may be forced to take actions such as reducing or eliminating distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all. In the event we cannot make relevant interest or principal payments we may be in default under the terms of our credit facilities, which would materially affect our business and operations.
 
Our credit facilities contain, and we expect that any new or amended credit facilities we may enter into will contain, restrictive covenants, which may limit our business and financing activities, including our ability to make distributions.

The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our credit facilities and in any new or amended credit facility we enter into in the future could adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities. For example, our credit facilities require the consent of our lenders to, or limit our ability to, among other items:
 
incur or guarantee indebtedness;
charge, pledge or encumber the vessels;
change the flag, class, management or ownership of our vessels;
change the commercial and technical management of our vessels;
sell or change the beneficial ownership or control of our vessels; and
subordinate our obligations thereunder to any general and administrative costs relating to the vessels, including the fixed daily fee payable under the management agreement.

Our credit facilities also require us to comply with the ISM Code and to maintain valid safety management certificates and documents of compliance at all times. In addition, effective for a three year period from the end of June 2009 to the end of June 2012, our amended credit facilities require us to:
 
maintain minimum free consolidated liquidity (50% of which may be in the form of undrawn commitments under the relevant credit facility) of at least $500,000 per collateralized vessel;
maintain a ratio of EBITDA (as defined in each credit facility) to interest expense of at least 2.00 to 1.00 on a trailing four-quarter basis; and
maintain a ratio of net Total Indebtedness to the aggregate Fair Market Value (as defined in each credit facility) of our total fleet, current or future, of no more than 0.80 (the “leverage ratio”).

In addition, our credit facilities require that we maintain an aggregate fair market value of the vessels in our fleet at least 125% of the aggregate amount outstanding under each credit facility (the “collateral maintenance”). The interest margin of our credit facilities increased from 1.35% to 1.45% over LIBOR in connection with an amendment to the facilities in 2009. Although we were in compliance with these financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2010, our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our credit facilities may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions, interest rate developments, changes in the funding costs of our banks and changes in asset valuations. If market or other economic conditions further deteriorate or fail to improve, our ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we are in breach of any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our credit facilities, especially if we trigger a cross-default currently contained in our credit facilities, a significant portion of our obligations may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, obligations under our credit facilities are secured by our vessels, and if we are unable to repay debt under the credit facilities, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets.
 
 
 
 
Furthermore, any contemplated vessel acquisitions will have to be at levels that do not impair the required ratios set out above. The recent global economic downturn has had an adverse effect on tanker asset values which is likely to persist if the economic slowdown resumes.  If the estimated asset values of the vessels in our fleet continue to decrease, such decreases may limit the amounts we can drawdown under our credit facilities to purchase additional vessels and our ability to expand our fleet. In addition, we may be obligated to pre-pay part of our outstanding debt in order to remain in compliance with the relevant covenants in our credit facilities.  If funds under our credit facilities become unavailable as a result of a breach of our covenants or otherwise, we may not be able to perform our business strategy which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
If we are in breach of any of the terms of our credit facilities, as amended, a significant portion of our obligations may become immediately due and payable and our lenders’ commitments to make further loans to us may terminate. We may also be unable to execute our business strategy.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our credit facilities and any other debt instruments we may enter into in the future may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate further, our ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we are in breach of any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our credit facilities, especially if we trigger a cross-default currently contained in our credit facilities or any interest rate swap agreements we have entered into pursuant to their terms, a significant portion of our obligations may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We may not be able to reach agreement with our lenders to amend the terms of the loan agreements or waive any breaches and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make any accelerated payments. In addition, obligations under our credit facilities are secured by our vessels, and if we are unable to repay debt under the credit facilities, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets. Furthermore, if funds under our credit facilities become unavailable as a result of a breach of our covenants or otherwise, we may not be able to execute our business strategy which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Decreases in asset values due to circumstances outside of our control may limit our ability to make further draw-downs under our credit facilities which may limit our ability to purchase additional vessels in the future. In addition, if asset values continue to decrease significantly, we may have to pre-pay part of our outstanding debt in order to remain in compliance with covenants under our credit facilities.

Our credit facilities require that we maintain an aggregate fair market value of the vessels in our fleet at least 125% of the aggregate amount outstanding under each credit facility.  Any contemplated vessel acquisitions will have to be at levels that do not impair the required ratios. The recent global economic downturn has had an adverse effect on tanker asset values which is likely to persist if the economic slowdown resumes. If the estimated asset values of the vessels in our fleet continue to decrease, such decreases may limit the amounts we can drawdown under our credit facilities to purchase additional vessels and our ability to expand our fleet. In addition, we may be obligated to pre-pay part of our outstanding debt in order to remain in compliance with the relevant covenants in our credit facilities. As a result, such decreases could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Restrictions in our debt agreements may prevent us from paying distributions.

Our payment of interest and, following the end of the relevant non-amortizing periods, principal on our debt will reduce cash available for distribution on our units. In addition, our credit facilities prohibit the payment of distributions if we are not in compliance with certain financial covenants or  upon the occurrence of an event of default or if the fair market value of the vessels in our fleet is less than 125% of the aggregate amount outstanding under each of our credit facilities.
 
Events of default under our credit facilities include:
 
failure to pay principal or interest when due;
breach of certain undertakings, negative covenants and financial covenants contained in the credit facility, any related security document or guarantee or the interest rate swap agreements, including failure to maintain unencumbered title to any of the vessel-owning subsidiaries or any of the assets of the vessel-owning subsidiaries and failure to maintain proper insurance;
any breach of the credit facility, any related security document or guarantee or the interest rate swap agreements (other than breaches described in the preceding two bullet points) if, in the opinion of the lenders, such default is capable of remedy and continues unremedied for 20 days after written notice of the lenders;
 
 
 
 
any representation, warranty or statement made by us in the credit facility or any drawdown notice thereunder or related security document or guarantee or the interest rate swap agreements is untrue or misleading when made;
a cross-default of our other indebtedness of $5.0 million or greater or of the indebtedness of our subsidiaries of $750,000 or greater;
we become, in the reasonable opinion of the lenders, unable to pay our debts when due;
any of our or our subsidiaries’ assets are subject to any form of execution, attachment, arrest, sequestration or distress in respect of a sum of $1.0 million or more that is not discharged within 10 business days;
an event of insolvency or bankruptcy;
cessation or suspension of our business or of a material part thereof;
unlawfulness, non-effectiveness or repudiation of any material provision of our credit facility, of any of the related finance and guarantee documents or of our interest rate swap agreements;
failure of effectiveness of security documents or guarantee;
the common units cease to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Market or on any other recognized securities exchange;
any breach under any provisions contained in our interest rate swap agreements;
termination of our interest rate swap agreements or an event of default thereunder that is not remedied within five business days;
invalidity of a security document in any material respect or if any security document ceases to provide a perfected first priority security interest; or
any other event that occurs or circumstance that arises in light of which the lenders reasonably consider that there is a significant risk that we will be unable to discharge our liabilities under the credit facility, related security and guarantee documents or interest rate swap agreements.

We anticipate that any subsequent refinancing of our current debt or any new debt could have similar or more onerous restrictions. For more information regarding our financing arrangements, please read Item 5A: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.
 
We currently derive all of our revenues from a limited number of customers, and the loss of any customer or charter or vessel could result in a significant loss of revenues and cash flow.

We have derived, and believe that we will continue to derive, all of our revenues and cash flow from a limited number of customers. For the year ended December 31, 2010, BP Shipping Limited, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc accounted for 49%, 11% and 11% of our revenues, respectively, as compared to 54%, 20% and 11% of our revenues, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2008 BP Shipping Limited and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., accounted for 48% and 29%, respectively. We could lose a customer or the benefits of some or all of a charter if:
 
the customer faces financial difficulties forcing it to declare bankruptcy or making it impossible for it to perform its obligations under the charter, including the payment of the agreed rates in a timely manner;
the customer fails to make charter payments because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise;
the customer tries to re-negotiate the terms of the charter agreement due to prevailing economic and market conditions;
the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter or purchase the vessel;
the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or damaged beyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the charter; or
a prolonged force majeure event affecting the customer, including damage to or destruction of relevant production facilities, war or political unrest prevents us from performing services for that customer.

Please read “Item 4B: Business Overview—Our Charters” below for further information on our customers.
 
If we lose a key charter, we may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable to us due to the long-term nature of most charters. If we are unable to re-deploy a vessel for which the charter has been terminated, we will not receive any revenues from that vessel, but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the vessel in proper operating condition. Until such time as the vessel is rechartered, we may have to operate it in the spot market at charter rates which may not be as favorable to us as our current charter rates. In addition, if a customer exercises its right to purchase a vessel, we would not receive any further revenue from the vessel and may be unable to obtain a substitute vessel and charter. This may cause us to receive decreased revenue and cash flows from having fewer vessels operating in our fleet. Any replacement newbuilding would not generate revenues during its construction, and we may be unable to charter any replacement vessel on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated charter. Any compensation under our charters for a purchase of the vessels may not adequately compensate us for the loss of the vessel and related time charter.
 
 
 
 
The loss of any of our customers, time or bareboat charters or vessels, or a decline in payments under our charters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Our largest customer, BP Shipping, may be materially adversely affected by the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. The oil leak also may result in additional or changes to existing regulation that could result in additional costs to us or expose us to additional liabilities.

Our largest customer, BP Shipping, is an affiliate of BP p.l.c. (“BP”).  BP and its affiliates may be materially adversely affected by the explosion onboard the semisubmersible drilling rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010 and the resulting oil leak from a well being operated by an affiliate of BP and in which such affiliate had a majority working interest.  Eight of our vessels are currently chartered to BP Shipping. BP Shipping accounted for approximately 54% and 49% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
On November 2, 2010, BP announced that, in addition to the $32.2 billion pre-tax charge it had previously announced in July 2010 to reflect the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, it had taken an additional pre-tax charge of $7.7 billion, reaching a total pre-tax charge of $39.9 billion, which represented its best estimate of reliably measurable costs at the time. Costs incurred relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill were $11.6 billion in total, and BP also incurred a headline replacement cost profit for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of $1.8 billion compared with a loss of $17.0 billion in the previous quarter. BP had previously announced the funding of a $20.0 billion escrow fund and its intention to sell assets for up to $30.0 billion, primarily in the upstream business, and announced that it had sales agreements in place totaling approximately $14.0 billion. Although BP has announced that these asset dispositions will be primarily focused in BP’s exploration and production business, such dispositions and continued losses, or failure on the part of BP to have accurately predicted such losses and future costs, could materially adversely affect BP generally and could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to meet our obligations and to make cash distributions.
 
In addition, in response to the Deepwater Horizon incident, the United States Congress is considering proposals that could result in additional and/or changes to existing regulation applicable to our operations. For example, bills have been introduced in both houses of the U.S. Congress that propose, among other things, to increase the limits of liability under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 for all vessels, including tanker vessels. These proposals also address requirements for disaster response planning.   If these or other bills are adopted, we could be subject to increased liabilities in the event of a disaster and/or increased operating costs.
 
We depend on Capital Maritime and its affiliates to assist us in operating and expanding our business.

Pursuant to a management agreement and an administrative services agreement between us and Capital Ship Management, Capital Ship Management provides significant commercial and technical management services (including the commercial and technical management of our vessels, class certifications, vessel maintenance and crewing, purchasing and insurance and shipyard supervision) as well as administrative, financial and other support services to us. Please read “Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions—Selected agreements entered into during the year ended December 31, 2007—Management Agreement” and “—Administrative Services Agreement” below. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy will depend significantly upon Capital Ship Management’s satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be harmed if Capital Ship Management fails to perform these services satisfactorily, if Capital Ship Management cancels or materially amends either of these agreements, or if Capital Ship Management stops providing these services to us.
 
Five of our 21 vessels are currently under charter with Capital Maritime. In the future we may enter into additional contracts with Capital Maritime to charter our vessels as they become available for rechartering. We may also contract with Capital Maritime for it to have newbuildings constructed on our behalf and to incur the construction-related financing, and we would purchase the vessels on or after delivery based on an agreed-upon price. If Capital Maritime defaults under any charter or does not perform its obligations under any contract we enter into, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Our ability to enter into new charters and expand our customer relationships will depend largely on our ability to leverage our relationship with Capital Maritime and its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry, including its ability to qualify for long term business with certain oil majors. If Capital Maritime suffers material damage to its reputation or relationships, it may harm our ability to:
 
renew existing charters upon their expiration;
obtain new charters;
successfully interact with shipyards during periods of shipyard construction constraints;
obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms; or
maintain satisfactory relationships with suppliers and other third parties.
 
 
 
 
If our ability to do any of the things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Our growth depends on continued growth in demand for refined products and crude oil and the continued demand for seaborne transportation of refined products and crude oil.

Our growth strategy focuses on expansion in the refined product tanker and crude oil shipping sector. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth in world and regional demand for refined products and crude oil and the transportation of refined products and crude oil by sea, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including:
 
the economic and financial developments globally, including actual and projected global economic growth.
fluctuations in the actual or projected price of refined products and crude oil;
refining capacity and its geographical location;
increases in the production of oil in areas linked by pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the development of new, pipeline systems in markets we may serve, or the conversion of existing non-oil pipelines to oil pipelines in those markets;
decreases in the consumption of oil due to increases in its price relative to other energy sources, other factors making consumption of oil less attractive or energy conservation measures;
availability of new, alternative energy sources; and
negative or deteriorating global or regional economic or political conditions, particularly in oil consuming regions, which could reduce energy consumption or its growth.
 
 The refining industry has been negatively affected by the economic downturn and in certain cases industry participants have postponed or cancelled certain investment expansion plans, including plans for additional refining capacity. Continued reduced demand for refined products and crude oil and the shipping of refined products or crude oil or the increased availability of pipelines used to transport refined products or crude oil, would have a material adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we will face substantial competition.

Medium- to long-term time charters and bareboat charters have the potential to provide income at pre-determined rates over more extended periods of time. However, the process for obtaining longer term time charters and bareboat charters is highly competitive and generally involves a lengthy, intensive and continuous screening and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids that often extends for several months. In addition to the quality, age and suitability of the vessel, longer term shipping contracts tend to be awarded based upon a variety of other factors relating to the vessel operator further described below under “Our vessels’ present and future employment could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process”.
 
In addition to having to meet the stringent requirements set out by charterers, it is likely that we will also face substantial competition from a number of competitors who may have greater financial resources, stronger reputation or experience than we do when we try to recharter our vessels. It is also likely that we will face increased numbers of competitors entering into our transportation sectors, including in the ice class sector. Increased competition may cause greater price competition, especially for medium- to long-term charters.
 
As a result of these factors, we may be unable to expand our relationships with existing customers or obtain new customers for medium- to long-term time charters or bareboat charters on a profitable basis, if at all. Even if we are successful in employing our vessels under longer term time charters or bareboat charters, our vessels will not be available for trading in the spot market during an upturn in the tanker market cycle, when spot trading may be more profitable. If we cannot successfully employ our vessels in profitable time charters our results of operations and operating cash flow could be adversely affected.
 
Our vessels’ present and future employment could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process.

Shipping, and especially crude oil, refined product and chemical tankers have been, and will remain, heavily regulated. The so called “oil majors” companies, together with a number of commodities traders, represent a significant percentage of the production, trading and shipping logistics (terminals) of crude oil and refined products worldwide. Concerns for the environment have led the oil majors to develop and implement a strict ongoing due diligence process when selecting their commercial partners. This vetting process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vessel operator and the vessel, including physical ship inspections, completion of vessel inspection questionnaires performed by accredited inspectors and the production of comprehensive risk assessment reports. In the case of term charter relationships, additional factors are considered when awarding such contracts, including:
 
 
 
 
office assessments and audits of the vessel operator;
the operator’s environmental, health and safety record;
compliance with the standards of the International Maritime Organization (the “IMO”), a United Nations agency that issues international trade standards for shipping;
compliance with heightened industry standards that have been set by several oil companies;
shipping industry relationships, reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise;
shipping experience and quality of ship operations, including cost-effectiveness;
quality, experience and technical capability of crews;
the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and overall financial stability;
relationships with shipyards and the ability to obtain suitable berths;
construction management experience, including the ability to procure on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer specifications;
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure events; and
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.

Should either Capital Maritime or Capital Ship Management not continue to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes on an ongoing basis, our vessels’ present and future employment as well as our relationship with our existing charterers and our ability to obtain new charterers, whether medium- or long-term, could be adversely affected. Such a situation may lead to the oil majors’ terminating existing charters and refusing to use our vessels in the future which would adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. Please read “Item 4B: Business Overview—Major Oil Company Vetting Process” for more information regarding this process.
 
We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from acquisitions, and implementing our growth strategy through acquisitions of vessels or other shipping businesses may harm our business, financial condition and operating results and ability to make cash distributions.

Our growth strategy focuses on a gradual expansion of our fleet. We may also pursue opportunities for acquisitions of, or combinations with, other shipping businesses. Any acquisition of a vessel or business may not be profitable to us at or after the time we acquire it and may not generate cash flow sufficient to justify our investment. In addition, our growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results, including risks that we, or Capital Ship Management, our manager, as the case may be, may:
 
fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer relationships, cost-savings or cash flow enhancements;
be unable to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
fail to meet the covenants under our loans regarding the fair market value of our vessels;
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with the business or vessels acquired;
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges; or
not be able to service our debt or make cash distributions.

Unlike newbuildings, existing vessels typically do not carry warranties as to their condition. While we generally inspect existing vessels prior to purchase, such an inspection would normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a vessel’s condition as we would possess if it had been built for us and operated by us during its life. Repairs and maintenance costs for existing vessels are difficult to predict and may be substantially higher than for vessels we have operated since they were built. These costs could decrease our cash flow and reduce our liquidity.
 
If we purchase and operate secondhand vessels, we will be exposed to increased operating costs which could adversely affect our earnings and, as our fleet ages, the risks associated with older vessels could adversely affect our ability to obtain profitable charters.

Our current business strategy includes additional growth through the acquisition of new and secondhand vessels. While we typically inspect secondhand vessels prior to purchase, this does not provide us with the same knowledge about their condition that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated solely by us. Generally, we do not receive the benefit of warranties from the builders for the secondhand vessels that we acquire. Our fleet has an average age of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011. In general the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel making older vessels less desirable to charterers.
 
 
 
 
If Capital Maritime or any third party seller we may contract with in the future for the purchase of newbuildings fails to make construction payments for such vessels, the shipyard may rescind the purchase contract and we may lose access to such vessels or need to finance such vessels before they begin operating, which could harm our business and our ability to make cash distributions.

The newbuildings we have acquired since our initial public offering on the Nasdaq Global market on April 3, 2007 (the “IPO”) had all been contracted directly by Capital Maritime and all costs for the construction and delivery of such vessels have been incurred by Capital Maritime. In the future, we may enter into similar arrangements with Capital Maritime or other third parties for the acquisition of newbuildings. If Capital Maritime or any third party sellers we contract with in the future fail to make construction payments for the newbuildings after receiving notice by the shipbuilder following nonpayment on any installment due date, the shipbuilder could rescind the newbuilding purchase contract. As a result of such default, Capital Maritime or the third party seller could lose all or part of the installment payments made prior to such default, and we could either lose access to such newbuilding or any future vessels we contract to acquire or may need to finance such vessels before they begin operating and generating voyage revenues, which could harm our business and reduce our ability to make cash distributions.
 
If we finance the purchase of any additional vessels or businesses we acquire in the future through cash from operations, by increasing our indebtedness or by  issuing debt or equity securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be diminished, our financial leverage could increase or our unitholders could be diluted. In addition, if we expand the size of our fleet by directly contracting newbuildings in the future, we generally will be required to make significant installment payments for such acquisitions prior to their delivery and generation of any revenue.

The actual cost of a new product or crude oil tanker varies significantly depending on the market price charged by shipyards, the size and specifications of the vessel, whether a charter is attached to the vessel and the terms of such charter, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards. The total delivered cost of a vessel will be higher and include financing, construction supervision, vessel start-up and other costs.
 
To date, all the newbuildings we have acquired have been contracted directly by Capital Maritime and all costs for the construction and delivery of these vessels have been incurred by Capital Maritime. As of December 31, 2010, our fleet consisted of 21 vessels, only eight of which had been part of our initial fleet at the time of our IPO. We have financed the purchase of the additional vessels either with debt, or partly with debt, cash and partly by issuing additional equity securities.  If we issue additional common units or other equity securities to finance the acquisition of a vessel or business, your ownership interest in us will be diluted. Please read “Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us—We may issue additional equity securities without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interest” below.
 
If we elect to expand our fleet in the future by entering into contracts for newbuildings directly with shipyards, we generally will be required to make installment payments prior to their delivery. We typically must pay 5% to 25% of the purchase price of a vessel upon signing the purchase contract, even though delivery of the completed vessel will not occur until much later (approximately 18-36 months later for current orders) which could reduce cash available for distributions to unitholders. If we finance these acquisition costs by issuing debt or equity securities, we will increase the aggregate amount of interest payments or quarterly distributions we must make prior to generating cash from the operation of the newbuilding.
 
To fund the acquisition price of a business or of any additional vessels we may contract to purchase from Capital Maritime or other third parties and other related capital expenditures, we will be required to use cash from operations or incur borrowings or raise capital through the sale of debt or additional equity securities. Use of cash from operations will reduce cash available for distributions to unitholders. Even if we are successful in obtaining necessary funds, the terms of such financings could limit our ability to pay cash distributions to unitholders. Incurring additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense and financial leverage, and issuing additional equity securities may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase the aggregate amount of cash required to meet our quarterly distributions to unitholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Delays in deliveries, our decision to cancel or our inability to otherwise complete the acquisitions of any newbuildings we may decide to acquire in the future, could harm our operating results and lead to the termination of any related charters.

Any newbuildings we may contract to acquire or order in the future could be delayed, not completed or canceled, which would delay or eliminate our expected receipt of revenues under any charters for such vessels. The shipbuilder or third party seller could fail to deliver the newbuilding vessel or any other vessels we acquire or order as may be agreed, or Capital Maritime, or relevant third party, could cancel a purchase or a newbuilding contract because the shipbuilder has not met its obligations, including its obligation to maintain agreed refund guarantees in place for our benefit. For prolonged delays, the customer may terminate the time charter.
 
Our receipt of newbuildings could be delayed, canceled, or otherwise not completed because of:
 
quality or engineering problems;
changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards;
 
 
 
 
work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard;
bankruptcy or other financial or liquidity problems of the shipbuilder;
a backlog of orders at the shipyard;
political or economic disturbances in the country or region where the vessel is being built;
weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake or fire;
the shipbuilder failing to deliver the vessel in accordance with our vessel specifications;
our requests for changes to the original vessel specifications;
shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel;
our inability to finance the purchase of the vessel;
a deterioration in Capital Maritime’s relations with the relevant shipbuilder; or
our inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals.

If delivery of any vessel we contract to acquire in the future is materially delayed, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
The vessels that currently make up our fleet, as well as the remaining vessel we may purchase from Capital Maritime under our omnibus agreement, have been built in accordance with custom designs from three different shipyards, and the vessels from each respective shipyard are the same in all material respects. As a result, any latent defect discovered in one vessel will likely affect all of our vessels.

The vessels that make up our fleet, with the exception of the M/T Amore Mio II, as well as certain sister vessels in Capital Maritime’s fleet for which we have been granted a right of first offer, are based on standard designs from Hyundai MIPO Dockyard Co., Ltd., South Korea, STX Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., South Korea and Baima Shipyard, China, and have been customized by Capital Maritime, in some cases in consultation with the charterers of the vessel, and are, or will be, uniform in all material respects. All vessels have the same or similar equipment. As a result, any latent design defect discovered in one of our vessels will likely affect all of our other vessels in that class. As a result, any equipment defect discovered may affect all of our vessels. Any disruptions in the operation of our vessels resulting from defects could adversely affect our receipt of revenues under the charters for the vessels affected.
 
Certain design features in our vessels have been modified by Capital Maritime to enhance the commercial capability of our vessels. As a result, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, complications, delays and other unknown factors which could adversely affect our revenues.

Capital Maritime has modified certain design features in our vessels which have, in certain cases, not been in operation for meaningful periods of time. If these modifications fail to enhance the commercial capability of our vessels as intended or interfere with the operation of our vessels, we could face expensive and time-consuming design modifications, delays in the operation of our vessels, damaged customer relationships and harm to our reputation. Any disruptions in the operation of our vessels resulting from the design modifications could adversely affect our receipt of revenues under the charters for the vessels affected.
 
Political and government instability, terrorist or other attacks, war or international hostilities can affect the tanker industry, which may adversely affect our business.

We conduct most of our operations outside of the United States. In particular, we derive a portion of our revenues from shipping oil and oil products from politically unstable regions and our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions may be adversely affected by the effects of political instability, terrorist or other attacks, war or international hostilities. Past political efforts to disrupt shipping in these regions, particularly in the Arabian Gulf, have included attacks on ships and mining of waterways. Terrorist attacks such as the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the bombings in Spain on March 11, 2004 and in London on July 7, 2005, the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and other current and future conflicts and the continuing response of the United States to these attacks, as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks, continue to contribute to world economic instability and uncertainty in global financial markets. Future terrorist attacks could result in increased volatility of the financial markets in the United States and globally and could negatively impact the US and world economy, potentially leading to an economic recession. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all.
 
In the past, political instability has also resulted in attacks on vessels, such as the attack on the M/T Limburg in October 2002, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. Acts of terrorism and piracy have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. In addition, oil facilities, shipyards, vessels, pipelines and oil and gas fields could be targets of future terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, among other things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance costs, and the inability to transport oil and other refined products to or from certain locations. Any of these occurrences or other events beyond our control that adversely affect the distribution, production or transportation of oil and other refined products to be shipped by us could entitle our customers to terminate our charter contracts and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make cash distributions.
 
 
 
 
Furthermore, our operations may be adversely affected by changing or adverse political and governmental conditions in the countries where our vessels are flagged or registered and in the regions where we otherwise engage in business. Any disruption caused by these factors may interfere with the operation of our vessels, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our operations may also be adversely affected by expropriation of vessels, taxes, regulation, tariffs, trade embargoes, economic sanctions or a disruption of or limit to trading activities, or other adverse events or circumstances in or affecting the countries and regions where we operate or where we may operate in the future.
 
If our vessels call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the United States government, it could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our common units.

From time to time, the charterers that operate our vessels may arrange for vessels in our fleet may call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States government and countries identified by the United States government as state sponsors of terrorism. The U.S. sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or strengthened over time. In 2010, the U.S. enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act (“CISADA”), which expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to non-U.S. persons, such as our partnership, and introduces limits on the ability to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleum or petroleum products.
 
Although these sanctions and embargoes do not prevent our vessels from making calls to ports in these countries, potential investors could view such port calls negatively, which could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our common units. Although we believe that we are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or other penalties and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in our units. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us simply because we do business with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation. Investor perception of the value of our units may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
 
Marine transportation is inherently risky, and an incident involving significant loss of, or environmental contamination by, any of our vessels could harm our reputation and business.

Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as:
 
marine disasters;
bad weather;
mechanical failures;
grounding, fire, explosions and collisions;
piracy;
human error; and
war and terrorism.

An accident involving any of our vessels could result in any of the following:
 
environmental damage, including potential liabilities or costs to recover any spilled oil or other petroleum products and to restore the eco-system where the spill occurred;
death or injury to persons, loss of property;
delays in the delivery of cargo;
loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts;
governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business;
higher insurance rates; and
damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally.

Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
 
 
 
 
Compliance with safety and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be costly and could reduce our net cash flows and net income.

The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be certified as being “in class” by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the Safety of Life at Sea Convention.
 
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. In lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be placed on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. We expect our vessels to be on special survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every vessel is also required to be drydocked every two to three years for inspection of its underwater parts, a cost which is undertaken by our manager under the terms of our management agreement.
 
If any vessel does not maintain its class or fails any annual, intermediate or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be unemployable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
 
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our operations.

The operation of ocean-going vessels in international trade is inherently risky. Not all risks can be adequately insured against and any particular claim may not be paid for any number of reasons. We do not currently maintain off-hire insurance, covering loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods such as may occur whilst a vessel is under repair. Accordingly, any extended vessel off-hire due to an accident or otherwise, could have a materially adverse effect on our business and our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders. Claims covered by insurance are subject to deductibles and since it is possible that a large number of claims may arise, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. Certain of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual protection and indemnity associations, and as a member of such associations we may be required to make additional payments over and above budgeted premiums if member claims exceed association reserves. Please read “—We will be subject to funding calls by our protection and indemnity associations, and our associations may not have enough resources to cover claims made against them, resulting in potential unbudgeted supplementary liability to fund claims made upon us.” below.
 
We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, certain of our vessels are under bareboat charters with BP Shipping Limited and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. Under the terms of these charters, the charterer provides for the insurance of the vessel and as a result these vessels may not be adequately insured and/or in some cases may be self-insured. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our ships failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime self-regulatory organizations.
 
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be available to us may be significantly more expensive than our existing coverage.
 
We will be subject to funding calls by our protection and indemnity associations, and our associations may not have enough resources to cover claims made against them, resulting in potential unbudgeted supplementary liability to fund claims made upon us.

We are indemnified for legal liabilities incurred while operating our vessels through membership in P&I Associations. P&I Associations are mutual insurance associations whose members must contribute proportionately to cover losses sustained by all the association’s members. The objective of a P&I Association is to provide mutual insurance based on the aggregate tonnage of a member’s vessels entered into the association. Claims are paid through the aggregate premiums of all members of the association, although members remain subject to calls for additional funds if the aggregate premiums are insufficient to cover claims submitted to the association. Claims submitted to the association may include those incurred by members of the association, as well as claims submitted to the association from other P&I Associations with which our P&I Association has entered into pooling agreements. The P&I Associations to which we belong may not remain viable and we may become subject to additional funding calls which could adversely affect us.
 
 
 
 
The maritime transportation industry is subject to substantial environmental and other regulations, which may significantly limit our operations or increase our expenses.

Our operations are affected by extensive and changing international, national and local environmental protection laws, regulations, treaties, conventions and standards in force in international waters, the jurisdictional waters of the countries in which our vessels operate, as well as the countries of our vessels’ registration. Many of these requirements are designed to reduce the risk of oil spills, air emissions and other pollution, and to reduce potential negative environmental effects associated with the maritime industry in general. Our compliance with these requirements can be costly.
 
These requirements can affect the resale value or useful lives of our vessels, require a reduction in cargo capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports, or detention in certain ports. Under local, national and foreign laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and natural resource damages, in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous substances from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. We could also become subject to personal injury or property damage claims relating to the release of or exposure to hazardous materials associated with our current or historic operations. Violations of or liabilities under environmental requirements also can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels.
 
We could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs, fines, penalties, third-party claims and natural resource damages, as the result of an oil spill or other liabilities under environmental laws. The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) affects all vessel owners shipping oil or petroleum products to, from or within the United States. OPA 90 allows for potentially unlimited liability without regard to fault of owners, operators and bareboat charterers of vessels for oil pollution in U.S. waters. Similarly, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended, which has been adopted by most countries outside of the U.S., imposes liability for oil pollution in international waters. OPA 90 expressly permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to hazardous materials and oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries. Coastal states in the U.S. have enacted pollution prevention liability and response laws, many providing for unlimited liability.
 
In addition to complying with existing laws and regulations and those that may be adopted, shipowners may incur significant additional costs in meeting new maintenance and inspection requirements, in developing contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining insurance coverage. Government regulation of vessels, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, can be expected to become stricter in the future and require us to incur significant capital expenditure on our vessels to keep them in compliance, or even to scrap or sell certain vessels altogether. For example, recent amendments to MARPOL regulations regarding the prevention of air pollution from ships establish a series of progressive standards to further limit the sulphur content in fuel oil, which will be phased in through 2020, and new tiers of nitrogen oxide (“NOx”) emission standards for new marine diesel engines, depending on their date of installation. Additionally, more stringent emission standards apply in the coastal areas designated as Emission Control Areas, including the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the United States and Canadian coastal areas.
 
Further legislation, or amendments to existing legislation, applicable to international and national maritime trade is expected over the coming years relating to environmental matters, such as ship recycling, sewage systems, emission control (including emissions of greenhouse gases), ballast treatment and handling.
 
For example, legislation and regulations that will require more stringent controls of air emissions from ocean-going vessels are pending or have been approved at the federal and state level in the U.S. The relevant standards are consistent with the 2008 Amendments to Annex VI of MARPOL. Such legislation or regulations may require significant additional capital expenditures (such as additional costs required for the installation of control equipment on each vessel) or operating expenses (such as increased costs for low-sulfur fuel) in order for us to maintain our vessels’ compliance with international and/or national regulations.
 
In addition, various jurisdictions, including the IMO and the United States, have proposed or implemented requirements governing the management of ballast water to prevent the introduction of non-indigenous species considered to be invasive. The IMO has adopted the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments (the “BWM Convention”), which calls for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will enter into force 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the worlds merchant shipping tonnage. As of December 31, 2010, 27 states, representing approximately 25.2% of the world’s merchant shipping tonnage, have ratified the BWM Convention. We may incur additional costs to install the relevant control equipment on our vessels in order to comply with the new standards.
 
In the United States, ballast water management legislation has been enacted in several states, and federal legislation is currently pending in the U.S. Congress. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has also adopted a rule which requires commercial vessels to obtain a “Vessel General Permit” from the U.S. Coast Guard in compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the “Clean Water Act”) regulating the discharge of ballast water and other discharges into U.S. waters. Significant expenditures for the installation of additional equipment or new systems on board our vessels may be required in order to comply with existing or future regulations regarding ballast water management in these other jurisdictions, along with the potential for increased port disposal costs.
 
 
 
 
Other requirements may also come into force regarding the protection of endangered species which could lead to changes in the routes our vessels follow or in trading patterns generally and thus to additional capital expenditures. Additionally, new environmental regulations with respect to greenhouse gas emissions and preservation of biodiversity amongst others, are expected to come into effect following the agreement and execution of a G8 environmental agreement. A meeting of the G8 to discuss such matters took place in Canada in June 2010.
 
Furthermore, as a result of marine accidents we believe that regulation of the shipping industry will continue to become more stringent and more expensive for us and our competitors. In recent years, the IMO and EU have both accelerated their existing non-double-hull phase-out schedules in response to highly publicized oil spills and other shipping incidents involving companies unrelated to us. Future incidents may result in the adoption of even stricter laws and regulations, which could limit our operations or our ability to do business and which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
 
Please read “Item 4B: Business Overview—Regulation” below for a more detailed discussion of the regulations applicable to our vessels.
 
The crew employment agreements manning agents enter into on behalf of Capital Maritime or any of its affiliates, including Capital Ship Management, our manager, may not prevent labor interruptions and the failure to renegotiate these agreements successfully in the future may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our cash flows.

The crew employment agreements that manning agents enter into on behalf of Capital Maritime or any of its affiliates, including Capital Ship Management, our manager, may not prevent labor interruptions and are subject to renegotiation in the future. Any labor interruptions, including due to a failure to renegotiate employment agreements with our crew members successfully could disrupt our operations and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
 
Arrests of our vessels by maritime claimants could cause a significant loss of earnings for the related off-hire period.

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lienholder may enforce its lien by “arresting” or “attaching” a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could result in a significant loss of earnings for the related off-hire period. In addition, in jurisdictions where the “sister ship” theory of liability applies, a claimant may arrest the vessel which is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. In countries with “sister ship” liability laws, claims might be asserted against us or any of our vessels for liabilities of other vessels that we own.
 
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us

Capital Maritime and its affiliates may engage in competition with us.

Pursuant to the omnibus agreement that we and Capital Maritime have entered into, Capital Maritime and its controlled affiliates (other than us, our general partner and our subsidiaries) have agreed not to acquire, own or operate medium- range tankers under time charters of two or more years without the consent of our general partner. The omnibus agreement, however, contains significant exceptions that may allow Capital Maritime or any of its controlled affiliates to compete with us, which could harm our business.  Please read “Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions— Selected agreements entered into during the year ended December 31, 2007—Omnibus Agreement—Noncompetition”.
 
Unitholders have limited voting rights and our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of unitholders owning 5% or more of our units.

Holders of common units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. We hold a meeting of the limited partners every year to elect one or more members of our board of directors and to vote on any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting. Common unitholders elect only four of the seven members of our board of directors. We do not currently have any outstanding subordinated units. The elected directors will be elected on a staggered basis and will serve for three-year terms. Our general partner in its sole discretion has the right to appoint the remaining three directors and to set the terms for which those directors will serve. The partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management. Unitholders have no right to elect our general partner and our general partner may not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least 66⅔% of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class and a majority vote of our board of directors. Currently, 25,846,332 common units are owned by public unitholders, representing a 66.8% common unitholder interest in us.
 
 
 
 
Our partnership agreement further restricts unitholders’ voting rights by providing that if any person or group, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of our board of directors, owns beneficially 5% or more of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes, except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board, determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes, unless required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will be redistributed pro rata among the other unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. As an affiliate of our general partner, Capital Maritime is not subject to this limitation. Capital Maritime owns a 31.2% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest in us through its ownership of our general partner.
 
Our general partner and its other affiliates own a significant interest in us and have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary and contractual duties, which may permit them to favor their own interests to your detriment.

Capital Maritime currently owns a 31.2% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest in us through its ownership of our general partner. The common units owned by Capital Maritime have the same rights as our other outstanding common units. Our general partner effectively controls our day-to-day affairs consistent with policies and procedures adopted by and subject to the direction of our board of directors. Our general partner and its affiliates and our directors have a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders. However, the officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to Capital Maritime. Furthermore, all of the officers of our general partner and certain of our directors are directors or officers of Capital Maritime and its affiliates, and as such they have fiduciary duties to Capital Maritime that may cause them to pursue business strategies that disproportionately benefit Capital Maritime or which otherwise are not in the best interests of us or our unitholders. Conflicts of interest may arise between Capital Maritime and its affiliates, including our general partner and its officers, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, our general partner and its affiliates may favor their own interests over the interests of our unitholders. Please read “—Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s and our directors’ fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner or our directors” below. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:
 
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires our general partner or Capital Maritime or its affiliates to pursue a business strategy that favors us or utilizes our assets, and Capital Maritime’s officers and directors have a fiduciary duty to make decisions in the best interests of the unitholders of Capital Maritime, which may be contrary to our interests;
the executive officers of our general partner and three of our directors also serve as executive officers and/or directors of Capital Maritime;
our general partner and our board of directors are allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as Capital Maritime, in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting their fiduciary duties to our unitholders;
our general partner and our directors have limited their liabilities and reduced their fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands, while also restricting the remedies available to our unitholders, and, as a result of purchasing our units, unitholders are treated as having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties and to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner and our directors, all as set forth in the partnership agreement;
our general partner and our board of directors will be involved in determining the amount and timing of our asset purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings, and issuances of additional partnership securities and reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution to our unitholders;
our general partner may have substantial influence over our board of directors’ decision to cause us to borrow funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a distribution on any subordinated units or to make incentive distributions;
our general partner is entitled to reimbursement of all reasonable costs incurred by it and its affiliates for our benefit;
our partnership agreement does not restrict us from paying our general partner or its affiliates for any services rendered to us on terms that are fair and reasonable or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf; and
our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase our outstanding units if it and its affiliates own more than 80% of our common units.

Although a majority of our directors will over time be elected by common unitholders, our general partner will likely have substantial influence on decisions made by our board of directors. Please read “Item 7B:  Related-Party Transactions” below.
 
The vote of a majority of our common unitholders is required to amend the terms of our partnership agreement. Capital Maritime currently owns 29.8% of our common units and can significantly impact any vote under the terms of our partnership agreement which may allow Capital Maritime to favor its interests and may significantly affect your rights under the partnership agreement. In addition, Capital Maritime is not subject to the limitations on voting rights imposed on our other limited partners.
 
 

 
Capital Maritime currently owns 11,304,651 common units, or 29.8% of our total common units. Following the termination of the subordination period in February 2009 and the resulting conversion of all of our outstanding subordinated units to common units, the affirmative vote of a majority of common units (or in certain cases a higher percentage), are required in order to amend the terms of the partnership agreement or to reach certain decisions or actions, including:
 
amendments to the definition of available cash, operating surplus, adjusted operating surplus;
changes in our cash distribution policy;
elimination of the obligation to pay the minimum quarterly distribution;
elimination of the obligation to hold an annual general meeting;
removal of any appointed director for cause;
transfer of the general partner interest;
transfer of the incentive distribution rights;
the ability of the board to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;
resolution of conflicts of interest;
withdrawal of the general partner;
removal of the general partner;
dissolution of the partnership;
change to the quorum requirements;
approval of merger or consolidation; and
any amendment to the partnership agreement.

In addition, prior to such conversion, any shortfall in the payment of the quarterly distribution was borne first by the owners of the subordinated units. Following such conversion the risk is now borne by our common unitholders, including Capital Maritime, equally.
 
Our partnership agreement further restricts unitholders’ voting rights by providing that if any person, other than our general partner or its affiliates, their transferees and persons who acquire units with the prior approval of our board of directors owns beneficially 5% or more of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and that the voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will be redistributed pro rata among the other unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. See “—Unitholders have limited voting rights and our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of unitholders owning 5% or more of our units” above for more information. As an affiliate of our general partner, Capital Maritime is not subject to this limitation. In addition, Capital Maritime, which holds 11,304,651 common units representing 29.8% of our common units and is our largest unitholder, may propose amendments to the partnership agreement that may favor its interests over yours and which may change or limit your rights under the partnership agreement.
 
Fees and cost reimbursements paid by us to Capital Ship Management for services provided to us and certain of our subsidiaries will be substantial, may fluctuate and will reduce our cash available for distribution to you. Such fees and cost reimbursements, the amount of which is determined by Capital Ship Management, may increase as vessel costs continue to increase or due to other unforeseen events, and may change upon the expiration of the management and administrative agreements currently in place.

We pay a fixed daily fee for an initial term of approximately five years from the time we take delivery of each vessel for services provided to us by Capital Ship Management, and we reimburse Capital Ship Management for all expenses it incurs on our behalf. The fixed daily fee to be paid to Capital Ship Management includes all costs incurred in providing certain commercial and technical management services to us, including vessel maintenance, crewing, purchasing and insurance and also includes the expenses for each vessel’s next scheduled special or intermediate survey, as applicable, and related drydocking. In addition to the fixed daily fees payable under the management agreement, Capital Ship Management is entitled to supplementary remuneration for extraordinary fees and costs of any direct and indirect expenses it reasonably incurs in providing these services which may vary from time to time, and which includes, amongst others, certain costs associated with the vetting of our vessels, repairs related to unforeseen events and insurance deductibles in accordance with the terms of the management agreement (the “extraordinary fees”). For the year ended December 31, 2010 such fees amounted to approximately $2.0 million, compared to $3.0 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such costs may increase further to reflect unforeseen events and the continuing inflationary vessel costs environment. In addition, Capital Ship Management provides us with administrative services, including audit, legal, banking, investor relations, information technology and insurance services, pursuant to an administrative services agreement with an initial term of five years from the date of our IPO, and we reimburse Capital Ship Management for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by it in connection with the provision of those services. Costs for these services are not fixed and fluctuate depending on our requirements.
 
Our management agreement with Capital Ship Management is scheduled to expire (at the earliest) for seven of our vessels during 2011 and for an additional four during 2012. At such time, and in the event any new vessels are acquired, we will have to enter into new agreements with Capital Ship Management or a third party for the provision of the above services. It is possible that any such new agreement may not be on the same or similar terms as our existing agreements, and that the level of our operating costs may materially change following any such renewal. Any increase in the costs and expenses associated with the provision of these services by our manager in the future, such as the condition and age of our vessels, costs of crews for our time chartered vessels and insurance, will lead to an increase in the fees we will have to pay to Capital Ship Management under any new agreements we enter into. The payment of fees to Capital Ship Management and reimbursement of expenses to Capital Ship Management could adversely affect our ability to pay cash distributions.
 
 
 
 
We currently do not have any officers and rely, and expect to continue to rely, solely on officers of our general partner, who face conflicts in the allocation of their time to our business.

Our board of directors has not exercised its power to appoint officers of Capital Product Partners L.P. to date, and as a result, we rely, and expect to continue to rely, solely on the officers of our general partner, who are not required to work full-time on our affairs and who also work for affiliates of our general partner, including Capital Maritime. For example, our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer is also an executive officer of Capital Maritime and Crude Carriers Corp., an affiliate of Capital Maritime. The affiliates of our general partner conduct substantial businesses and activities of their own in which we have no economic interest. As a result, there could be material competition for the time and effort of the officers of our general partner who also provide services to our general partner’s affiliates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s and our directors’ fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner or our directors.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the standards to which our general partner and directors would otherwise be held by Marshall Islands law.  For example, our partnership agreement:
 
permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner. Where our partnership agreement permits, our general partner may consider only the interests and factors that it desires, and in such cases it has no duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting us, our affiliates or our unitholders. Decisions made by our general partner in its individual capacity will be made by its sole owner, Capital Maritime. Specifically, pursuant to our partnership agreement, our general partner will be considered to be acting in its individual capacity if it exercises its call right, pre-emptive rights or registration rights, consents or withholds consent to any merger or consolidation of the partnership, appoints any directors or votes for the election of any director, votes or refrains from voting on amendments to our partnership agreement that require a vote of the outstanding units, voluntarily withdraws from the partnership, transfers (to the extent permitted under our partnership agreement) or refrains from transferring its units, general partner interest or incentive distribution rights or votes upon the dissolution of the partnership;
provides that our general partner and our directors are entitled to make other decisions in “good faith” if they reasonably believe that the decision is in our best interests;
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee of our board of directors and not involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be “fair and reasonable” to us and that, in determining whether a transaction or resolution is “fair and reasonable”, our board of directors may consider the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and
provides that neither our general partner and its officers nor our directors will be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or directors or its officers or directors or those other persons engaged in actual fraud or willful misconduct.

In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.
 
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a person or group from attempting to remove our current management or our general partner, and even if public unitholders are dissatisfied, they will be unable to remove our general partner without Capital Maritime’s consent unless Capital Maritime’s ownership share in us is below a specified threshold, all of which could diminish the trading price of our units.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a person or group from attempting to remove our current management or our general partner:
 
The unitholders will be unable to remove our general partner without its consent because if general partner and its affiliates own sufficient units to be able to prevent such removal. The vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of all outstanding units voting together as a single class and a majority vote of our board of directors is required to remove the general partner. As of December 31, 2010, Capital Maritime owned a 31.2% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest in us through its ownership of our general partner while 66.8% of our common units were owned by public unitholders.
 
 
 
 
Common unitholders elect only four of the seven members of our board of directors. Our general partner in its sole discretion has the right to appoint the remaining three directors.
Election of the four directors elected by common unitholders is staggered, meaning that the members of only one of three classes of our elected directors are selected each year. In addition, the directors appointed by our general partner will serve for terms determined by our general partner.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings of unitholders, to nominate directors and to acquire information about our operations as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.
Unitholders’ voting rights are further restricted by the partnership agreement provision providing that if any person or group, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of our board of directors, owns beneficially 5% or more of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes, except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board, determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes, unless required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will be redistributed pro rata among the other common unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote.
We have substantial latitude in issuing equity securities without unitholder approval.

One effect of these provisions may be to diminish the price at which our units will trade.
 
The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.

Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. In addition, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of the members of our general partner from transferring their respective membership interests in our general partner to a third party. Any such change in control of our general partner may affect the way we and our operations are managed which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions.
 
Substantial future sales of our units in the public market could cause the price of our units to fall.

We have granted registration rights to Capital Maritime and certain affiliates of Capital Maritime. These unitholders have the right, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering any of our common, subordinated or other equity securities owned by them at such time or to include those securities in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other unitholders. Following the early termination of the subordination period on February 14, 2009, all of our 8,805,522 subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. There are currently no outstanding subordinated units. As of December 31, 2010 Capital Maritime owned 11,304,651 common units registered under our Registration Statement on Form F-3 dated August 29, 2008, as amended (the “Form F-3”), and certain incentive distribution rights. By exercising their registration rights or selling a large number of units or other securities, as the case may be, these unitholders could cause the price of our units to decline.
 
We may issue additional equity securities without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interests.

We may, without the approval of our unitholders, issue an unlimited number of additional units or other equity securities, including securities to Capital Maritime. During 2010 we financed the acquisition of two vessels from Capital Maritime through the issuance of additional common units through public offerings under our Form F-3. Previously we financed a portion of the purchase price of two non-contracted vessels we acquired from Capital Maritime during the first half of 2008 through the issuance of additional common units directly to Capital Maritime. In addition, in August 2010, we issued a total of 795,200 restricted common units under our Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan adopted in April 2008, as amended. The issuance by us of additional units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
 
our unitholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may decrease;
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and
the market price of the units may decline.

In establishing cash reserves, our board of directors may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to you.

Our partnership agreement requires our board of directors to deduct from operating surplus cash reserves that it determines are necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. These reserves will also affect the amount of cash available for distribution to our unitholders. Our board of directors may also establish reserves for distributions on any future subordinated units, but only if those reserves will not prevent us from distributing the minimum quarterly distribution, plus any arrearages, on the common units for the following four quarters. We currently do not have any subordinated units outstanding. As described above in “—Risks Inherent in Our Business—We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, each quarter our board of directors is required to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted”, our partnership agreement requires our board of directors each quarter to deduct from operating surplus estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, as opposed to actual expenditures, which could reduce the amount of available cash for distribution. The amount of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by our board of directors at least once a year, provided that any change must be approved by the conflicts committee of our board of directors.
 
 
 
 
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require you to sell your units at an undesirable time or price.

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units our general partner will have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the common units or subordinated units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not less than their then-current market price. As a result, you may be required to sell your common units or subordinated units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your units.
 
You may not have limited liability if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.

As a limited partner in a partnership organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, you could be held liable for our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if you participate in the “control” of our business. Our general partner generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, such as its debts and environmental liabilities, except for those contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to our general partner. In addition, the limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some jurisdictions in which we do business. Please read “The Partnership Agreement—Limited Liability” in our Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 19, 2007, for a more detailed discussion of the implications of the limitations on liability to a unitholder.
 
We can borrow money to pay distributions, which would reduce the amount of credit available to operate our business.

Our partnership agreement allows us to make working capital borrowings to pay distributions. Accordingly, we can make distributions on all our units even though cash generated by our operations may not be sufficient to pay such distributions. Any working capital borrowings by us to make distributions will reduce the amount of working capital borrowings we can make for operating our business. For more information, please read “Item 5B: Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowings”.
 
Increases in interest rates may cause the market price of our units to decline.

An increase in interest rates may cause a corresponding decline in demand for equity investments in general, and in particular for yield based equity investments such as our units. Any such increase in interest rates or reduction in demand for our units resulting from other relatively more attractive investment opportunities may cause the trading price of our units to decline.
 
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions.

Under some circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under the Marshall Islands Limited Partnership Act (the “Marshall Islands Act”), we may not make a distribution to you if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Marshall Islands law provides that for a period of three years from the date of the impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Marshall Islands law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. Assignees who become substituted limited partners are liable for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the partnership that are known to the assignee at the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be determined from the partnership agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.
 
We have incurred, and may continue to incur significant costs in complying with the requirements of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If management is unable to continue to provide reports as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to continue to provide us with unqualified attestation reports as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our common units.

We completed our IPO on the Nasdaq Global Market on April 3, 2007. As a publicly traded limited partnership, we are required to comply with the SEC’s reporting requirements and with corporate governance and related requirements of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC and the Nasdaq Global Market, on which our common units are listed. Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”) requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis and include in our reports filed with the SEC our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a related attestation of our independent registered public accounting firm. As our manager, Capital Maritime provides substantially all of our financial reporting, and we depend on the procedures they have in place. If, in such future annual reports on Form 20-F, our management cannot provide a report as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified attestation report as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our common units.
 
 
 
 
We have and expect we will continue to have to dedicate a significant amount of time and resources to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements of SOX 404. We will continue to work with our legal, accounting and financial advisors to identify any areas in which changes should be made to our financial and management control systems to manage our growth and our obligations as a public company. However, these and other measures we may take may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely and reliable basis. If we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our financial statements may be materially misstated. We have incurred and will continue to incur legal, accounting and other expenses in complying with these and other applicable regulations. We anticipate that our incremental general and administrative expenses as a publicly traded limited partnership taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will include costs associated with annual reports to unitholders, tax returns, investor relations, registrar and transfer agent’s fees, incremental director and officer liability insurance costs and director compensation.
 
We have been organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well developed body of partnership law.

Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership agreement and by the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited partnership laws of a number of states in the United States, most notably the State of Delaware. The Marshall Islands Act also provides that it is to be applied and construed to make it uniform with the laws of the State of Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act and, so long as it does not conflict with the Marshall Islands Act or decisions of the Marshall Islands courts, interpreted according to the non-statutory law (or case law) of the State of Delaware. There have been, however, few, if any, court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall Islands Act, in contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly well-developed body of case law interpreting its limited partnership statute. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the courts in Delaware. For example, the rights of our unitholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our general partner under Marshall Islands law are not as clearly established as under judicial precedent in existence in Delaware. As a result, unitholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by our general partner and its officers and directors than would unitholders of a limited partnership formed in the United States.
 
Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.

We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands as a limited partnership.  Our general partner is organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands as a limited liability company. The Marshall Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States and provides protections for investors to a significantly lesser extent.
 
Most of our directors and the directors and officers of our general partner and those of our subsidiaries are residents of countries other than the United States.  Substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets and a substantial portion of the assets of our directors and the directors and officers of our general partner are located outside the United States. Our business is operated primarily from our office in Greece. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us, our directors, our general partner, our subsidiaries or the directors and officers of our general partner or enforce against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state of the United States. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions would (1) recognize or enforce against us, our directors, our general partner’s directors or officers judgments of courts of the United States based on civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws; or (2) impose liabilities against us, our directors, our general partner or our general partner’s directors and officers in original actions brought in the Marshall Islands, based on these laws.
 
Tax Risks

In addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Item 10E: Taxation” for a more complete discussion of the expected material U.S. federal and non-U.S. income tax considerations relating to us and the ownership and disposition of our units.
 
 
 
 
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company”, which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. unitholders.

A foreign entity taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes if (x) at least 75.0% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income”, or (y) at least 50.0% of the average value of the entity’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income”. For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property, and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income”. U.S. persons who own shares of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
 
Based on our current and projected method of operation, we believe that we are not currently a PFIC and we do not expect to become a PFIC in the future. We intend to treat our income from time chartering activities as non-passive income, and the vessels engaged in those activities as non-passive assets, for PFIC purposes.  However, no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will accept this position. There are legal uncertainties involved in this determination, because there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our current and projected future operations.  Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS or a United States court will accept the position that we are not a PFIC and there is a risk that the IRS or a United States court could determine that we are a PFIC.  Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any future taxable year if there were to be changes in our assets, income or operations. See “Item 10E: Taxation—PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences”.
 
The enactment of previously proposed legislation could affect whether dividends paid by us constitute qualified dividend income eligible for the preferential rate.

Previously proposed legislation would deny the preferential rate of U.S. federal income tax currently imposed on qualified dividend income with respect to dividends received from a non-U.S. corporation, unless the non-U.S. corporation either is eligible for benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States or is created or organized under the laws of a foreign country that has a comprehensive income tax system. Because the Marshall Islands has not entered into a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States and imposes only limited taxes on entities organized under its laws, it is unlikely that we could satisfy either of these requirements. Consequently, if this legislation were enacted the preferential tax rates of federal income tax discussed under “Item 10E: Taxation—Distributions” herein may no longer be applicable to distributions received from us. As of the date hereof, it is not possible to predict with any certainty whether this previously proposed legislation will be reintroduced and enacted.
 
We may have to pay tax on United States source income, which would reduce our earnings.

Under the Code, 50% of the gross shipping income of a vessel-owning or chartering corporation that is attributable to transportation that either begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the U.S. is characterized as U.S. source shipping income and such income generally is subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code. We believe that we and each of our subsidiaries will qualify for this statutory tax exemption, and we will take this position for U.S. federal income tax return reporting purposes. See “Item 10E: Taxation—The Section 883 Exemption”. However, there are factual circumstances, including some that may be beyond our control, which could cause us to lose the benefit of this tax exemption. In addition, our conclusion that we currently qualify for this exemption is based upon legal authorities that do not expressly contemplate an organization structure such as ours. Although we have elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, for corporate law purposes we are organized as a limited partnership under Marshall Islands law. Our general partner will be responsible for managing our business and affairs and has been granted certain veto rights over decisions of our board of directors. Therefore, we can give no assurances that the IRS will not take a different position regarding our qualification, or the qualification of any of our subsidiaries, for this tax exemption.
 
If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 for any taxable year, we or our subsidiaries generally would be subject for those years to a 4% U.S. federal gross income tax on our U.S. source shipping income. The imposition of this taxation could have a negative effect on our business and would result in decreased earnings available for distribution to our unitholders.
 
You may be subject to income tax in one or more non-U.S. countries, including Greece, as a result of owning our units if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered to be carrying on business there. Such laws may require you to file a tax return with and pay taxes to those countries.
 
 

 
We intend that our affairs and the business of each of our controlled affiliates will be conducted and operated in a manner that minimizes income taxes imposed upon us and these controlled affiliates or which may be imposed upon you as a result of owning our units. However, because we are organized as a partnership, there is a risk in some jurisdictions that our activities and the activities of our subsidiaries may be attributed to our unitholders for tax purposes and, thus, that you will be subject to tax in one or more non-U.S. countries, including Greece, as a result of owning our units if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered to be carrying on business there. If you are subject to tax in any such country, you may be required to file a tax return with and pay tax in that country based on your allocable share of our income. We may be required to reduce distributions to you on account of any withholding obligations imposed upon us by that country in respect of such allocation to you. The United States may not allow a tax credit for any foreign income taxes that you directly or indirectly incur.
 
We believe we can conduct our activities in a manner so that our unitholders should not be considered to be carrying on business in Greece solely as a consequence of acquiring, holding, disposing of or participating in the redemption of our units. However, the question of whether either we or any of our controlled affiliates will be treated as carrying on business in any country, including Greece, will largely be a question of fact determined through an analysis of contractual arrangements, including the management agreement and the administrative services agreement we have entered into with Capital Ship Management, and the way we conduct business or operations, all of which may change over time. The laws of Greece or any other foreign country may also change, which could cause the country’s taxing authorities to determine that we are carrying on business in such country and are subject to its taxation laws. Any foreign taxes imposed on us or any subsidiaries will reduce our cash available for distribution.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4. Information on the Partnership.
 
A.   History and Development of the Partnership
 
We are a master limited partnership formed as Capital Product Partners L.P. under the laws of the Marshall Islands on January 16, 2007. We maintain our principal executive headquarters at 3 Iassonos Street, Piraeus, 18537 Greece and our telephone number is +30 210 4584 950.
 
In March 2007 we entered into a 10-year revolving credit facility of up to $370.0 million with HSH Nordbank AG which is non-amortizing until June 2012 and can be used for acquisitions and for general partnership purposes. To date, we have used $366.5 million of this facility.
 
On April 3, 2007, we completed our IPO of 13,512,500 common units at a price of $21.50 per unit. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of our common units. Capital Maritime used part of the proceeds from our IPO to repay the debt on the eight vessels that made up our fleet at the time of the IPO and concurrently transferred its interest in the vessel-owning companies of these eight newly built, double hull medium range (“MR”) product tanker under medium or long-term time or bareboat charter vessels to us. Capital Maritime also paid the offering expenses, underwriting discounts, selling commissions and brokerage fees incurred in connection with the IPO. At the time of the IPO Capital Maritime also granted us a right of first offer under an omnibus agreement for any MR tankers in its fleet under charter for two or more years, giving us the opportunity to purchase additional vessels in the future and we also entered into agreements with Capital Ship Management, a subsidiary of Capital Maritime, to provide management and technical services in connection with these and future vessels.
 
At the time of the IPO we also entered into an agreement to acquire seven newbuildings from Capital Maritime, for a total purchase price of $368.0 million, at the time of their delivery to Capital Maritime. We took delivery of the first four vessels between May and September 2007 with the remaining three vessels delivered between January and August 2008. All seven of these vessels were under medium to long term charters with BP Shipping Limited, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. at the time of their delivery.
 
Between September 2007 and April 2008 we also acquired three additional, non-contracted vessels from Capital Maritime. In September 2007 we acquired the M/T Attikos, a 12,000 dwt, 2005 built double-hull product tanker chartered to Trafigura Beheer B.V. at the time, at a purchase price of $23.0 million. In March 2008 we purchased the  M/T Amore Mio II, a 160,000 dwt, 2001 built tanker chartered to BP Shipping Limited at the time, and in April 2008 we purchased the M/T Aristofanis, a 12,000 dwt, 2005 built product tanker sister vessel to the M/T Attikos chartered to Shell International Trading & Shipping Company Ltd at the time. The aggregate purchase price for the M/T Amore Mio II was $95.0 million and for the M/T Aristofanis $23.0 million under the terms of the relevant share purchase agreement with Capital Maritime. We funded a portion of the purchase price of the vessels through the issuance of 2,048,823 and 501,308 common units to Capital Maritime, respectively, at a price of $18.42 and $20.08, respectively, per unit, which was the price per unit as quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange on the day prior to the respective acquisition, and the remainder through the incurrence of $57.5 million of debt under the 2008 facility and $2.0 million in cash. In conjunction with the equity issued to Capital Maritime, Capital Maritime, made capital contributions to our general partner, Capital GP L.L.C., of 40,976 and 10,026 common units, respectively, in order for it to maintain its 2% general partner interest in us.
 
In March 2008, we entered into an additional 10-year revolving credit facility of up to $350.0 million with HSH Nordbank AG which is non-amortizing until March 2013 and can be used to finance a portion of the purchase price of future acquisitions. To date, we have used $107.5 million of this facility, leaving capacity of $242.5 million, subject to compliance with the terms of the facility.
 
On August 29, 2008, we filed a Registration Statement on Form F-3 with the SEC using a “shelf” registration process.  Under this shelf registration process, we may sell, in one or more offerings, up to $300.0 million in total aggregate offering price of the common units, and Capital Maritime may sell up to 11,304,651 common units (including the 8,805,522 common units issued upon conversion of the subordinated units into common units on a one for one basis on February 14, 2009). Please see “2010 Developments” below for a description of certain securities offered under the shelf registration process.

On January 30, 2009, we announced the payment of an exceptional non-recurring distribution of $1.05 per unit for the fourth quarter of 2008, bringing annual distributions to unitholders to $2.27 per unit for the year ended December 31, 2008, a level which under the terms of our partnership agreement resulted in the early termination of the subordination period and the automatic conversion of the subordinated units into common units. Our board of directors unanimously determined that taking into account the totality of relationships between the parties involved, the payment of this exceptional distribution was in our best interests taking into consideration the general economic conditions, our business requirements, risks relating to our business as well as alternative uses available for our cash. This exceptional distribution was funded from operating surplus and through a decrease in existing reserves. Payment of the exceptional distribution was made on February 13, 2009 to unitholders of record on February 10, 2009. Following such automatic conversion in February 2009, Capital Maritime owned a 46.6% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest through its ownership of our general partner Capital GP L.L.C. The common units owned by Capital Maritime have the same rights as our other outstanding common units.
 
 
 
 
In April 2009, we extended our charter coverage and renewed our fleet when we acquired all of Capital Maritime’s interest in its wholly owned subsidiaries that own the M/T Ayrton II and the M/T Agamemnon II, two of the vessels identified under the omnibus agreement, in exchange for all of our interest in our wholly owned subsidiaries that owned the M/T Atrotos and the M/T Assos. Both acquired vessels were under time charters to BP expiring in 2011 at the time of their delivery. As part of the transaction, we paid an additional consideration of $4.0 million per vessel to Capital Maritime and remained responsible for any costs associated with the delivery of the vessels to Capital Maritime. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., the charterer of the M/T Assos and the M/T Atrotos prior to the exchange, compensated us for the early termination of the charters of these two vessels which were scheduled to expire in October 2009 and April 2010, respectively.
 
In June 2009, we reached agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, whereby we amended the terms of both our credit facilities effective for a three year period from the end of June 2009 to the end of June 2012. Under the terms of the amendments the fleet loan-to-value covenant was increased to 80% from 72.5%. It was also agreed to amend the manner in which market valuations of vessels are conducted. The interest margin was also increased to 1.35%-1.45% over LIBOR subject to the level of the asset covenants.  All other terms in our credit facilities remained unchanged.
 
2010 Developments
 
In January 2010, we rechartered two tanker vessels, the M/T Axios and the M/T Agisilaos, with Capital Maritime. Each charter commenced directly upon the vessel’s redelivery from its previous charter with BP Shipping Limited and is for a 12-month period (+/- 30 days).
 
On February 23, 2010 we announced the issuance of 5,800,000 common units at a public offering price of $8.85 per common unit under our Form F-3 shelf registration. An additional 481,578 common units were subsequently sold on the same terms following the partial exercise of the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters for the offering. Capital GP L.L.C., our general partner, participated in both the offering and the exercise of the over-allotment option and purchased an additional 128,195 units at the public offering price, thereby maintaining its 2 percent interest us. Aggregate proceeds, net of commissions but before expenses relating to the offering, were approximately $54.0 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to re-acquire the M/T Atrotos at an acquisition price of $43.0 million and for general partnership purposes. The M/T Atrotos was acquired with a bareboat charter attached, as, prior to its acquisition, the vessel had been leased to Arrendadora Ocean Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Arrendadora”) pursuant to a finance lease agreement expected to expire in March 2014, and was renamed M/T El Pipila and registered under Mexican flag.
 
In June 2010 we rechartered the M/T Arionas with Capital Maritime and the M/T Akeraios with BP Shipping Limited. Each charter commenced directly upon the respective vessel’s redelivery from its previous charter, and is for a 12-month period (+/- 30 days).
 
On June 30, 2010, we acquired the M/T Alkiviadis from Capital Maritime at a purchase price of $31.5 million, financed with cash. The M/T Alkiviadis is chartered to Capital Maritime for a 24-month period. The transaction was approved by our board of directors following approval by the conflicts committee of independent directors.
 
On July 22, 2010, we held our annual general meeting of unitholders, at which time the two initial directors appointed by Capital Maritime and designated as Class III elected directors were re-elected by a majority of our common unitholders (excluding common units held by Capital Maritime). As of the 2010 annual meeting of unitholders, a majority of our board is now elected by our common unitholders, rather than appointed by our general partner.
 
On August 9, 2010, we announced the issuance of 5,500,000 common units at a public offering price of $8.63 per common unit under our Form F-3 shelf registration.  An additional 552,254 common units were subsequently sold on the same terms following the partial exercise of the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Capital GP LLC, our general partner, participated in both the offering and the exercise of the over-allotment option and purchased an additional 123,515 units at the public offering price, thereby maintaining its 2 percent interest in the Partnership. Aggregate proceeds, net of commissions but before expenses relating to the offering, were approximately $50.8 million. The net proceeds from the offering were used to re-acquire the M/T Assos at an acquisition price of $43.5 million and for general partnership purposes.  The M/T Assos was acquired with a bareboat charter attached, as, prior to its acquisition, the vessel had been leased to Arrendadora pursuant to a finance lease agreement expected to expire in March 2014, and was renamed M/T Insurgentes and registered under Mexican flag.
 
In September 2010 we rechartered the M/T Anemos I with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”) for a 36-month period (+/- 30 days).
 
On August 31, 2010, we, either directly or through our General Partner, issued 795,200 (or 2% of our total units outstanding as of December 31, 2010) of the 800,000 units authorized under our Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan adopted in April 2008, as amended on July 22, 2010 to increase the aggregate number of awards issuable under the plan to 800,000 (the “Plan”). Awards were issued to all members of our board of directors, to officers of our General Partner, our manager, Capital Maritime and to employees of certain key affiliates and other eligible persons, with the majority vesting after three years from the date of issue, except for awards issued to our Chairman and to the three independent members of our board of directors which vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period. All awards are conditional upon the grantee’s continued service until the applicable vesting date and all awards accrue distributions payable upon vesting. Please read “Item 6E: Share Ownership—Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan” and Note 13 (Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan) to our Financial Statements included herein for additional information.
 
 
 
 
In October 2010 we rechartered the M/T Apostolos with BP Shipping Limited for a 24-month period (+/- 30 days).
 
In January 2011 we rechartered the M/T Amore Mio II with Capital Maritime for a 12-month period (+/- 30 days). The transaction was approved by our board of directors following approval by the conflicts committee of independent directors.
 
As of January 31, 2011, our fleet consisted of 21 double-hull, high specification tankers with 69% of the fleet total days in 2011 secured under period charter coverage. We currently have no capital commitments to purchase or build additional vessels. We intend to continue to evaluate potential acquisitions of vessels or businesses and to take advantage of our relationship with Capital Maritime in a prudent manner that is accretive to our unitholders and to long-term distribution growth.
 
Please see —Our Fleet below for more information regarding our vessels, their charters, acquisition dates and prices, charter rates and expirations, operating expenses and other information, “Item 5B: Liquidity and Capital Resources—Net Cash Used in Investing Activities” and Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding any acquisitions, including a detailed explanation of how they were accounted for and  “Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions” for a description of the terms of certain transactions.
 
 
B. Business Overview
 
We are an international tanker company and our vessels trade on a worldwide basis and are capable of carrying crude oil, refined oil products, such as gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and jet fuel, as well as edible oils and certain chemicals such as ethanol. Our fleet consists of 21 double-hull tankers with an average age of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011, including one of the largest Ice Class 1A MR product tanker fleets in the world based on number of vessels and carrying capacity with 69% of the fleet total days in 2011 secured under period charter coverage.  We currently charter 19 of our 21 vessels under medium to long-term time and bareboat charters (with an average remaining term of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011) to large charterers such as BP Shipping Limited, Petrobras, Capital Maritime and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. All our time and bareboat charters provide for the receipt of a fixed base rate for the life of the charter, and in the case of 9 of our 11 time charters, also provide for profit sharing arrangements in excess of the base rate. Please see “Profit Sharing Arrangements” below for a detailed description of how profit sharing is calculated. Capital Maritime currently owns a 31.2% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest in us through its ownership of our general partner.
 
 
Business Strategies
 
Our primary business objective is to pay a sustainable quarterly distribution per unit and to increase our distributions over time by executing on the following business strategies:
 
 
Maintain medium to long-term fixed charters.  We believe that the medium to long-term, fixed-rate nature of our charters, our profit sharing arrangements, and our agreement with Capital Ship Management for the commercial and technical management of our vessels provide a stable base of revenue and predictable expenses that will result in stable cash flows in the medium to long-term. As our vessels come up for rechartering we will seek to redeploy them under contracts that reflect our expectations of the market conditions prevailing at the time. We believe that the young age of our fleet, which is one of the youngest in the industry, the high specifications of our vessels and our manager’s ability to meet the rigorous vetting requirements of some of the world’s most selective major international oil companies position us well to recharter our vessels.
 
 
Expand our fleet through accretive acquisitions.  We intend to continue to evaluate potential acquisitions of additional vessels and to take advantage of our unique relationship with Capital Maritime to make strategic acquisitions in the medium to long term in a prudent manner that is accretive to our unitholders and to long-term distribution growth. In addition, we may pursue opportunities for acquisitions of, or combinations with, other shipping businesses. We will continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire both newbuildings and second-hand vessels, if and when they are chartered for more than two years, from Capital Maritime and from third parties as we seek to grow our fleet in a way that is accretive to our distributions.
 
 
Capitalize on our relationship with Capital Maritime and expand our charters with recognized charterers.  We believe that we can leverage our relationship with Capital Maritime and its ability to meet the rigorous vetting processes of leading oil companies in order to attract new customers. We also plan to increase the number of vessels we charter to our existing charterers as well as enter into charter agreements with new customers in order to maintain a portfolio of charters that is diverse from a customer, geography and maturity perspective.
 
 
 
 
 
Maintain and build on our ability to meet rigorous industry and regulatory safety standards. We believe that in order for us to be successful in growing our business in the future, we will need to maintain our excellent vessel safety record and maintain and build on our high level of customer service and support. Capital Ship Management has an excellent vessel safety record, is capable of complying with rigorous health, safety and environmental protection standards, and is committed to providing our customers with a high level of customer service and support.
 
Competitive Strengths
 
We believe that we are well-positioned to execute our business strategies and our future prospects for success are enhanced because of the following competitive strengths:
 
 
Strong relationship with Capital Maritime.  We believe our strong relationship with Capital Maritime and its affiliates provides numerous benefits which are essential to our long-term growth and success. Capital Maritime has a well-established reputation within the shipping industry and strong relationships with many of the world’s leading oil companies, commodity traders and shipping companies. We also benefit from Capital Maritime’s expertise in technical fleet management and its ability to meet the rigorous vetting requirements of some of the world’s most selective major international oil companies, including BP p.l.c., Chevron Corporation, Conoco-Phillips Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA, Total S.A. and many others.
 
 
Leading position in the product tanker market, with a modern, capable fleet, built to high specifications.  Our fleet of 21 double-hull tankers includes one of the largest Ice Class 1A MR fleets in the world based on number of vessels and carrying capacity. The IMO II/III and Ice Class 1A classification notations of most of our vessels provide a high degree of flexibility as to what cargoes our charterers can choose to trade as they employ our fleet. We also believe that the range in size and the geographic flexibility of our fleet are attractive to our charterers, allowing them to consider a variety of trade routes and cargoes. With an average age of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011, our fleet is one of the youngest fleets of its size in the world.  Finally, we believe our vessels’ compliance with existing and expected regulatory standards, the high technical specifications of our vessels and our fleet’s flexibility to transport a wide variety of refined products and crude oil across a wide range of trade routes is attractive to our existing and potential charterers.
 
 
Financial strength and flexibility.   Subject to compliance with the relevant covenants we currently have $246.0 million in undrawn amounts available under our 10-year non-amortizing credit facilities. We may use these amounts to finance up to 50% of the purchase price of any potential future purchases of modern tanker vessels from Capital Maritime or any third parties. We believe that the terms of our amended credit facilities enhance our financial flexibility to realize new vessel acquisitions from Capital Maritime and third parties.
 
Our Customers

We provide marine transportation services under medium- to long-term time charters or bareboat charters with counterparties that we believe are creditworthy. Currently, our customers include:
 
BP Shipping Limited, the shipping affiliate of BP p.l.c., one of the world’s largest producers of crude oil and natural gas. BP p.l.c. has exploration and production interests in over 20 countries. BP Shipping provides all logistics for the marketing of BP’s oil and gas cargoes.
Overseas Shipholding Group Inc., one of the largest independent shipping companies in the world operating crude and product tankers. As of October 31, 2009 Overseas Shipholding Group Inc.’s operating fleet consisted of 129 vessels, 26 of which were under construction, aggregating 13.1 million dwt.
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), the Brazilian state-run energy company, is an integrated oil and gas company with interests in exploration, production, refining, marketing and distribution. Petrobras also operates a fleet of close to 200 vessels and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Petrobras is one of the world’s biggest companies in the world by market value.
Arrendadora Ocean Mexicana S.A. de C.V., is a Mexican company specializing in the supply and operation of vessels for the offshore oil and gas industry.
Capital Maritime & Trading Corp., an established shipping company with activities in the sea transportation of wet (crude oil, oil products, chemicals) and dry cargos worldwide with a long history of operating and investing in the shipping markets.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, BP Shipping Limited, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc accounted for 49%, 11% and 11% of our revenues respectively compared to 54%, 20% and 11% of our revenues, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2008 BP Shipping Limited and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., accounted for 48% and 29%, respectively. The loss of any significant customer or a substantial decline in the amount of services requested by a significant customer could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
 
 
 
Our Fleet

At the time of our IPO on April 3, 2007, our fleet consisted of eight vessels. Since that date, the size of our fleet has greatly increased in terms of both number of vessels and carrying capacity and currently consists of 21 vessels of various sizes with an average age of approximately 4.6 years and average remaining term under our charters of approximately 4.6 years (as of January 31, 2011).
 
The following table summarizes certain key information with respect to the vessels we have purchased from Capital Maritime since our IPO:
 
Name of Vessel
Contracted Purchase at IPO
Acquisition/Delivery Date
 
Purchase Price
 
           
Atrotos (1)
Yes
May 2007
March 2010
  $ 56,000,000$43,000,000  
Akeraios
Yes
July 2007
  $ 56,000,000  
Anemos I
Yes
September 2007
  $ 56,000,000  
Apostolos
Yes
September 2007
  $ 56,000,000  
Attikos
No
September 2007
  $ 23,000,000  
Alexandros II
Yes
January 2008
  $ 48,000,000  
Amore Mio II (2)
No
March 2008
  $ 85,739,320  
Aristofanis (2)
No
April 2008
  $ 21,566,265  
Aristotelis II
Yes
June 2008
  $ 48,000,000  
Aris II
Yes
August 2008
  $ 48,000,000  
Agamemnon II (1)
No
April 2009
  $ 39,774,578  
Ayrton II (1)
No
April 2009
  $ 38,721,322  
Alkiviadis (3)
No
June 2010
  $ 31,500,000  
Assos (1) 
Yes
August 2010
  $ 43,500,000  
 

(1)           The M/T Agamemnon II and the M/T Ayrton II were acquired in exchange for the M/T Assos (which was part of our fleet at the time of the IPO) and the M/T Atrotos (which was acquired from Capital Maritime in May 2007) on April 7 and April 13, 2009, respectively. We subsequently re-acquired the M/T Atrotos and the M/T Assos from Capital Maritime in March and August 2010, respectively.  Capital Maritime had granted us an offer to acquire all four vessels under the terms of the omnibus agreement. Please see Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding these acquisitions.
(2)           The M/T Amore Mio II was acquired on March 27, 2008 and the M/T Aristofanis was acquired on April 30, 2008. Please see “Item 4A: History and Development of the Partnership” above and Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding these acquisitions, including a breakdown of the way such acquisitions were funded.
(3)           Capital Maritime had granted us an offer to purchase the M/T Alkiviadis under the terms of the omnibus agreement. Please see Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding this acquisition.

 
We intend to continue to take advantage of our unique relationship with Capital Maritime and, subject to prevailing shipping, charter and financial market conditions and the approval of our board of directors, make strategic acquisitions in the medium to long term in a prudent manner that is accretive to our unitholders and to long-term distribution growth. In addition, we may pursue opportunities for acquisitions of, or combinations with, other shipping businesses. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement we entered into with Capital Maritime at the time of our IPO, Capital Maritime has granted us a right of first offer for any MR tankers in its fleet under charter for two or more years. Two of the vessels identified under the omnibus agreement were acquired by us in April 2009 and an additional three were acquired during 2010. Capital Maritime is, however, under no obligation to fix any of these vessels under charters of two or more years. Please read Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions for a detailed description of our omnibus agreement with Capital Maritime.
 
 
 
 
The table below provides summary information as of January 31, 2011 about the vessels in our fleet and the vessels we may have the opportunity to acquire from Capital Maritime, as well as their delivery date or expected delivery date to us and their employment, including earliest possible redelivery dates of the vessels and the relevant charter rates. The table also includes the daily management fee and approximate expected termination date of the management agreement with Capital Ship Management with respect to each vessel. Sister vessels, which are vessels of similar specifications and size typically built at the same shipyard, are denoted by the same letter in the table. We believe that sister vessels provide a number of efficiency advantages in the management of our fleet.
 
All of the vessels in our fleet are or were designed, constructed, inspected and tested in accordance with the rules and regulations of Det Norske Veritas (“DNV”), Lloyd’s Register of Shipping (“Lloyd’s”)  or the American Bureau of Shipping (“ABS”) and were under time or bareboat charters from the time of their delivery.
 
OUR FLEET
Vessel name
Sister Vessels1
Year built
DWT
OPEX
(per day)
Management Agreement Expiration
Charter Duration/ Type2
Expiry of Charter3
Daily Charter Rate (Net)4
Profit Share5
Charterer6
Description
                       
       
VESSELS CURRENTLY IN OUR FLEET
       
                       
Atlantas7
A
2006
36,760
$250
Jan-Apr 2011
8-yr BC
Mar 2014
$15,0008
 
BP
Ice Class 1A IMO II/III
Chemical/ Product
Aktoras7
A
2006
36,759
$250
Apr-Jul 2011
8-yr BC
Jun 2014
$15,0008
 
BP
Aiolos7
A
2007
36,725
$250
Nov 2011-Feb 2012
8-yr BC
Feb 2015
$15,0008
 
BP
Agisilaos
A
2006
36,760
$5,500
May-Aug 2011
1-yr TC
Feb 2011
$11,850
ü
CMTC
Arionas
A
2006
36,725
$5,500
Aug-Nov 2011
1-yr TC
Sep 2011
$11,850
ü
CMTC
Axios
B
2007
47,872
$5,500
Dec 2011-Mar 2012
1-yr TC
Feb 2011
$12,591
ü
CMTC
Avax
B
2007
47,834
$5,500
Dec 2011-Mar 2012
1-yr TC
Apr 2011
$12,500
ü
BP
Akeraios
B
2007
47,781
$5,500
May-Aug 2012
1-yr TC
May 2011
$12,500
ü
BP
Anemos I
B
2007
47,782
$5,500
Jul-Oct 2012
3-yr TC
Aug 2013
$14,259
 
PTRB
Apostolos
B
2007
47,782
$5,500
Jul-Oct 2012
2-yr TC
Sep 2012
$14,000
ü
BP
Attikos
C
2005
12,000
$5,500
Sep-Nov 2012
Spot
 
Chem./Prod.
Alexandros II9
D
2008
51,258
$250
Dec 2012-Mar 2013
10-yr BC
Dec 2017
$13,000
 
OSG
IMO II/III
Chem./Prod.
Amore Mio II
E
2001
159,982
$8,500
Mar-Apr 2013
1-yr TC
Dec 2011
$25,000
 
CMTC
Crude Oil
Aristofanis
C
2005
12,000
$5,500
Mar-Apr 2013
Spot
 
Chem./Prod.
Aristotelis II10
D
2008
51,226
$250
Mar-Jun 2013
10-yr BC
May 2018
$13,000
 
OSG
IMO II/III
Chem./Prod.
Aris II10
D
2008
51,218
$250
May-Aug 2013
10-yr BC
Jul 2018
$13,000
 
OSG
Agamemnon II10
D
2008
51,238
$6,500
Oct 2013
3-yr TC
Dec 2011
$22,000
ü
BP
Ayrton II10
D
2009
51,260
$6,500
Mar 2014
2-yr TC
Mar 2012 11
$22,000
ü
BP
Atrotos10,12
B
2007
47,786
$500
Mar 2014
5-yr BC
Mar 2014
$16,825
 
ARR
Ice Class 1A
IMO II/III
Chem./Prod.
Alkiviadis
A
2006
36,721
$7,000
Jun 2015
2-yr TC
Jun 2012
$12,838
ü
CMTC
Assos 10,12
B
2006
47,872
$500
Mar 2014
5-yr BC
Mar 2014
$16,825
 
ARR
TOTAL FLEET DWT:
 
995,341
               
                       
 
VESSELS WE MAY PURCHASE FROM CAPITAL MARITIME IF UNDER LONG TERM CHARTER13
   
Aristidis
A
2006
36,680
               


1
Sister vessels are denoted in the tables by the same letter as follows: (A), (B): these vessels were built by Hyundai MIPO Dockyard Co., Ltd., South Korea, (C): these vessels were built by Baima Shipyard, China, (D): these vessels were built by STX Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., South Korea, (E): this vessel was built by Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co., Ltd., South Korea.
2
TC: Time Charter, BC: Bareboat Charter, Spot: Vessel is currently trading on the spot market.
3
Earliest possible redelivery date. For all charters the redelivery date is +/–30 days at the charterer’s option.
4
All rates quoted above are the net rates after we or our charterers have paid any relevant commissions on the base rate. The BP time and bareboat charters are subject to 1.25% commissions. No commissions are payable on the BP time charters. The CMTC time charters are subject to 1.25% commissions. The PTRB time charter is subject to 3% commissions. There are no commissions payable on the ARR charters. (See Footnote 6 below for full names of our charterers)
5
50/50 profit share element for all vessels applies only to voyages that breach Institute Warranty Limits (IWL). With the exception of the BP bareboat charters where no commissions are payable, the amounts received under these profit-sharing arrangements are subject to the same commissions payable on the gross charter rates.
6
BP: BP Shipping Limited. OSG: certain subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. CMTC: Capital Maritime & Trading Corp. (our Sponsor). PTRB: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras). ARR: Arrendadora Ocean Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
7
For the duration of the BC these vessels have been renamed British Ensign, British Envoy and British Emissary, respectively.
8
The last three years of the BC will be at a daily charter rate of $13,433 (net).
9
For the duration of the BC these vessels have been renamed: Overseas Serifos, Overseas Sifnos and Overseas Kimolos. OSG has an option to purchase each vessel at the end of the eighth, ninth or tenth year of its charter for $38.0 million, $35.5 million and $33.0 million, respectively, which option is exercisable six months before the date of completion of the relevant year of the charter. The expiration date above may therefore change depending on whether the charterer exercises its purchase option.
10
The M/T Agamemnon II and the M/T Ayrton II were acquired in exchange for the M/T Assos (which was part of our fleet at the time of the IPO) and the M/T Atrotos (which was acquired from Capital Maritime in May 2007) on April 7 and April 13, 2009, respectively. We subsequently re-acquired the M/T Atrotos and the M/T Assos from Capital Maritime in February and August 2010, respectively. Capital Maritime had granted us an offer to acquire all four vessels under the terms of the omnibus agreement. Please see Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding these acquisitions.
11
Charterers have the option to extend the time charter for one year upon the 2nd anniversary of the charter in March 2011.
12
For the duration of the TC these vessels have been renamed M/T El Pipila and M/T Insurgentes. ARR has subsequently delivered these vessels to Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex).
13
Pursuant to our omnibus agreement with Capital Maritime, Capital Maritime has granted us a right of first offer for any MR tankers in its fleet under charter for two or more years. We are under no obligation to exercise such right.
 
 
 
 
Our Charters
 
Nineteen of the 21 vessels in our fleet are under medium to long-term time or bareboat charters with an average remaining term under our charters of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011. Two of our vessels currently trade on the spot market and, under certain circumstances, we may operate additional vessels in the spot market until they have been fixed under appropriate medium to long-term charters. As our vessels come up for rechartering we will seek to redeploy them under contracts that reflect our expectations of the market conditions prevailing at the time. Please see —Our Fleet above, including the chart and accompanying notes, for more information on our time and bareboat charters, including counterparties, expected expiration dates of the charters and daily charter rates.
 
Time Charters
 
A time charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period of time at a specified daily rate. Under a time charter, the vessel’s owner provides crewing and other services related to the vessel’s operation, the cost of which is included in the daily rate and the charterer is responsible for substantially all vessel voyage costs except for commissions which are assumed by the owner. The basic hire rate payable under the charters is a previously agreed daily rate, as specified in the charter, payable at the beginning of the month in U.S. Dollars. We currently have 11 vessels under time charter agreements of which 9 contain profit-sharing provisions that allow us to realize at a pre-determined percentage additional revenues when spot rates are higher than the base rates incorporated in our charters or, in some instances, through greater utilization of our vessels by our charterers.
 
BP and Capital Maritime Profit Sharing Arrangements
 
The profit sharing arrangements for four of the five vessels chartered with Capital Maritime and for five of the eight vessels chartered with BP Shipping Limited are based on the calculation of the time charter equivalent (“TCE”) according to the “last to next” principle and are only applicable to voyages during which Institute Warranty Limits (“IWL”) have been breached. In such event, we receive the basic net hire rate plus 50% of the excess over the gross hire rate. This means that actual voyage revenues earned and received, actual expenses incurred and actual time taken to perform the voyage are used for the purpose of the calculation. The charterer is obliged to provide us with a copy of each fixture note and all reasonable documentation with respect to items of cost and earnings referring to each voyage during which Institute Warranty Limits have been breached. If the average daily TCE is less than or equal to the basic gross hire rate, then we receive the basic net hire rate only. If the average daily TCE for any voyage where IWL have been breached exceeds the basic gross hire rate, then we receive the basic net hire rate plus 50% of the excess over the gross hire rate. The profit share with both Capital Maritime and BP Shipping Limited is calculated and settled the next calendar month following the completion of the voyage.
 
The amounts received under these profit-sharing arrangements are subject to the same commissions payable on the gross charter rates. Please see —Our Fleet above, including the chart and accompanying notes, for more information on commissions payable and profit sharing arrangements.
 
TCE rate is a shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings generated by vessels on time charters with daily earnings generated by vessels on voyage charters, because charter hire rates for vessels on voyage charters are generally not expressed in per day amounts while charter hire rates for vessels on time charters generally are expressed in such amounts. TCE is expressed as per ship per day rate and is calculated as voyage and time charter revenues less voyage expenses during a period divided by the number of operating days during the period, which is consistent with industry standards.
 
Bareboat Charters
 
A bareboat charter is a contract pursuant to which the vessel owner provides the vessel to the customer for a fixed period of time at a specified daily rate, and the customer provides for all of the vessels expenses (including any commissions) and generally assumes all risk of operation. In the case of the vessels under bareboat charter to BP Shipping Limited, we are responsible for the payment of any commissions. The customer undertakes to maintain the vessel in a good state of repair and efficient operating condition and drydock the vessel during this period at its cost and as per the classification society requirements. The basic rate hire is payable to us monthly in advance in U.S. Dollars. We currently have eight vessels under bareboat charter, three with BP Shipping Limited, three with subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. and two with Arrendadora. The charters entered into with subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. and include options for the charterer to purchase each vessel for $38.0 million, $35.5 million or $33.0 million at the end of the eighth, ninth or tenth year of the charter, respectively. In each case, the option to purchase the vessel must be exercised six months prior to the end of the charter year.
 
 
 
 
Spot Charters
 
A spot charter generally refers to a voyage charter or a trip charter or a short term time charter. We currently have two vessels trading in the spot market.
 
Voyage / Trip Charter
 
A voyage charter involves the carriage of a specific amount and type of cargo on a load port-to-discharge port basis, subject to various cargo handling terms. Under a typical voyage charter, the shipowner is paid on the basis of moving cargo from a loading port to a discharge port. In voyage charters the shipowner generally is responsible for paying both vessel operating costs and voyage expenses, and the charterer generally is responsible for any delay at the loading or discharging ports. Under a typical trip charter or short term time charter, the shipowner is paid on the basis of moving cargo from a loading port to a discharge port at a set daily rate. The charterer is responsible for paying for bunkers and other voyage expenses, while the shipowner is responsible for paying vessel operating expenses.
 
Seasonality
 
Our vessels operate under medium to long-term charters and are not generally subject to the effect of seasonable variations in demand.
 
Management of Ship Operations, Administration and Safety
 
Capital Maritime, through its subsidiary Capital Ship Management, provides expertise in various functions critical to our operations. This enables a safe, efficient and cost-effective operation and, pursuant to a management agreement and an administrative services agreement we have entered into with Capital Ship Management, grants us  access to human resources, financial and other administrative services, including bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, client, investor relations, information technology and technical management services, including commercial management of the vessels, vessel maintenance and crewing (not required for vessels subject to bareboat charters), purchasing, insurance and shipyard supervision.
 
 Under our time charter arrangements, Capital Ship Management, our manager, is generally responsible for commercial, technical, health and safety and other management services related to the vessels operation, and the charterer is responsible for port expenses, canal dues and bunkers.  Pursuant to our management agreement, we pay a fixed daily fee per vessel for our time chartered vessels, for an initial term of approximately five years from when we take delivery of each vessel which covers vessel operating expenses, which include crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance and the expenses of the next scheduled special or intermediate survey for each vessel, as applicable, and related drydocking. Please see the table in Our Fleet above for a list of the daily fee payable and approximate expected termination dates of the management agreement with Capital Ship Management with respect to each vessel currently in our fleet. Capital Ship Management is directly responsible for providing all of these items and services. Capital Ship Management is also entitled to supplementary remuneration for extraordinary fees and costs (as defined in our management agreement) of any direct and indirect expenses it reasonably incurs in providing these services which may vary from time to time, and which includes, amongst others, certain costs associated with the vetting of our vessels, repairs related to unforeseen extraordinary events and insurance deductibles. For the year ended December 31, 2010 such fees amounted to $2.0 million compared to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Such costs may further increase to reflect unforeseen events and the continuing inflationary vessel costs environment. The sole expense we incur in connection with our vessels under bareboat charter is a fixed daily fee per vessel payable to Capital Ship Management, mainly to cover compliance costs. Capital Ship Management may provide these services to us directly or it may subcontract for certain of these services with other entities, including other Capital Maritime subsidiaries. Going forward, when we acquire new vessels or when the respective management agreements for our vessels expire, we will have to enter into new agreements which may provide for different fees or include different terms. For more information on the management agreement and administrative services agreements we have entered into with Capital Ship Management please read Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions—Selected Agreements entered into during the year ended December 31, 2007—Management Agreement and “—Administrative Services Agreement.
 
Capital Ship Management operates under a safety management system in compliance with the IMO’s ISM code and certified by Lloyds Register. Capital Ship Management’s management systems also comply with the quality assurance standard ISO 9001, the environmental management standard ISO 14001 and the Occupational Health & Safety Management System (“OHSAS”) 18001, all of which are certified by Lloyd’s Register of Shipping. Capital Ship Management recently implemented an “Integrated Management System Certification” approved by the Lloyds Register Group and also adopted “Business Continuity Management” principles in cooperation with Lloyd’s Register Group. Two of the vessels managed by Capital Ship Management Corp. topped BP’s ranking of top performing vessels in its time chartered fleet of over 100 vessels for 2008. Capital Ship Management was also selected as “Tanker Company of the Year 2009” at the annual Lloyd’s List Greek Shipping Awards which took place in December 2009.
 
 
 
 
As a result, our vessels’ operations are conducted in a manner intended to protect the safety and health of Capital Ship Managements employees, as applicable, the general public and the environment. Capital Ship Management’s technical management team actively manages the risks inherent in our business and is committed to eliminating incidents that threaten safety, such as groundings, fires, collisions and petroleum spills, as well as reducing emissions and waste generation.
 
Major Oil Company Vetting Process
 
Shipping in general, and crude oil, refined product and chemical tankers, in particular, have been, and will remain, heavily regulated. Many international and national rules, regulations and other requirements – whether imposed by the classification societies, international statutes (IMO, SOLAS (defined below), MARPOL, etc.), national and local administrations or industry – must be complied with in order to enable a shipping company to operate and a vessel to trade.
 
Traditionally there have been relatively few large players in the oil trading business and the industry is continuously consolidating. The so called oil majors companies, such as BP p.l.c., Chevron Corporation, Conoco-Phillips Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell plc, StatoilHydro ASA, and Total S.A., together with a few smaller companies, represent a significant percentage of the production, trading and, especially, shipping logistics (terminals) of crude and refined products world-wide. Concerns for the environment, health and safety have led the oil majors to develop and implement a strict due diligence process when selecting their commercial partners. This vetting process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vessel operator and the vessel.
 
While a plethora of parameters are considered and evaluated prior to a commercial decision, the oil majors, through their association, the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (“OCIMF”), have developed and are implementing two basic tools: (i) a Ship Inspection Report Programme (“SIRE”) and (ii) the Tanker Management & Self Assessment (“TMSA”) Program. The former is a physical ship inspection based upon a thorough Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (“VIQ”), and performed by accredited OCIMF inspectors, resulting in a report being logged on SIRE, while the latter is a recent addition to the risk assessment tools used by the oil majors.
 
Based upon commercial needs, there are three levels of risk assessment used by the oil majors: (i) terminal use, which will clear a vessel to call at one of the oil major’s terminals; (ii) voyage charter, which will clear the vessel for a single voyage; and (iii) term charter, which will clear the vessel for use for an extended period of time. The depth, complexity and difficulty of each of these levels of assessment vary. While for the terminal use and voyage charter relationships a ship inspection and the operator’s TMSA will be sufficient for the assessment to be undertaken, a term charter relationship also requires a thorough office assessment. In addition to the commercial interest on the part of the oil major, an excellent safety and environmental protection record is necessary to ensure an office assessment is undertaken.
 
We believe Capital Maritime and Capital Ship Management are among a small number of ship management companies to have undergone and successfully completed audits by six major international oil companies in the last few years (i.e., BP p.l.c., Chevron Corporation, ExxonMobil Corporation Royal Dutch Shell plc,, StatoilHydro ASA, and Total S.A.
 
Crewing and Staff
 
Capital Ship Management, an affiliate of Capital Maritime, through a subsidiary in Romania and crewing offices in Romania, Russia and the Philippines recruits senior officers and crews for our vessels. Capital Ship Management also maintains a presence in the Philippines and Russia and has entered into an agreement for the training of officers under ice conditions at a specialized training center in St. Petersburg. Capital Maritimes vessels are currently manned primarily by Romanian, Russian and Filipino crew members. Having employed these crew configurations for Capital Maritime for a number of years, Capital Ship Management has considerable experience in operating vessels in this configuration and has a pool of certified and experienced crew members which we can access to recruit crew members for our vessels.
 
Classification, Inspection and Maintenance
 
Every oceangoing vessel must be classed and certified by a classification society. The classification society is responsible for verifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules and regulations of the classification society and ship’s country of registry as well as the international conventions of which that country has accepted and signed. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.
 
 
 
 
The classification society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state or port authority. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned.
 
For the maintenance of the class certificate, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull and machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows:
 
Annual Surveys, which are conducted for the hull and the machinery at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated on the certificate.
 
Intermediate Surveys, which are extended annual surveys and are typically conducted two and one-half years after commissioning and after each class renewal survey. In the case of newbuildings, the requirements of the intermediate survey can be met through an underwater inspection in lieu of drydocking the vessel. Intermediate surveys may be carried out on the occasion of the second or third annual survey.
 
Class Renewal Surveys (also known as special surveys), which are carried out at the intervals indicated by the classification for the hull (usually at five year intervals). During the special survey, the vessel is thoroughly examined, including Non-Destructive Inspections (“NDIs”) to determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society will order steel renewals. The classification society may grant a one-year grace period for completion of the special survey. Substantial amounts of funds may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every five years, depending on whether a grace period is granted, a ship-owner or manager has the option of arranging with the classification society for the vessel’s hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed within a five-year cycle. At an owner’s application, the surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an agreed schedule to extend over the entire period of class. This process is referred to as ESP (Enhanced Survey Program) and CSM (Continuous Machinery Survey).
 
Occasional Surveys which are carried out as a result of unexpected events, e.g. an accident or other circumstances requiring unscheduled attendance by the classification society for re-confirming that the vessel maintains its class, following such an unexpected event.
 
All areas subject to survey, as defined by the classification society, are required to be surveyed at least once per class period, unless shorter intervals between surveys are prescribed elsewhere. The period between two subsequent surveys of each area must not exceed five years.
 
Most vessels are also drydocked every 30 to 36 months for inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. If any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue a ‘‘recommendation’’ which must be rectified by the ship-owner within prescribed time limits. Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as in class by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies. All of our vessels are certified as being in class by ABS and Lloyd’s. All new and secondhand vessels that we may purchase must be certified prior to their delivery under our standard agreements. If any vessel we contract to purchase is not certified as in class on the date of closing, we will have no obligation to take delivery of such vessel.
 
Risk Management and Insurance
 
The operation of any ocean-going vessel carries an inherent risk of catastrophic marine disasters, death or personal injury and property losses caused by adverse weather conditions, mechanical failures, human error, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. The occurrence of any of these events may result in loss of revenues or increased costs or, in the case of marine disasters, catastrophic liabilities. Although we believe our current insurance program is comprehensive, we cannot insure against all risks, and we cannot be certain that all covered risks are adequately insured against or that we will be able to achieve or maintain similar levels of coverage throughout a vessel’s useful life. Furthermore, there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid by the insurer or that it will always be possible to obtain insurance coverage at reasonable rates. More stringent environmental regulations at times in the past have resulted in increased costs for, and may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against the risks of environmental damage or pollution. Moreover, under the terms of our bareboat charters, the charterer provides for the insurance of the vessel, and as a result, these vessels may not be adequately insured and/or in some cases may be self-insured. Any uninsured or under-insured loss has the potential to harm our business and financial condition or could materially impair or end our ability to trade or operate.
 
We currently carry the traditional range of main and liability insurance coverage for each of our vessels to protect against most of the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our business. Specifically we carry:
 
Hull and machinery insurance covers loss of or damage to a vessel due to marine perils such as collisions, grounding and weather and the coverage is usually to an agreed insured value which, as a matter of policy, is never less than the particular vessels fair market value. Cover is subject to policy deductibles which are always subject to change.
 
 

 
Increased value insurance augments hull and machinery insurance cover by providing a low-cost means of increasing the insured value of the vessels in the event of a total loss casualty.

Protection and indemnity insurance is the principal coverage for third party liabilities and indemnifies against such liabilities incurred while operating vessels, including injury to the crew, third parties, cargo or third party property loss (including oil pollution) for which the shipowner is responsible. We carry the current maximum available amount of coverage for oil pollution risks, $1.0 billion per vessel per incident.

War Risks insurance covers such items as piracy and terrorism.

Freight, Demurrage & Defense cover is a form of legal costs insurance which responds as appropriate to the costs of prosecuting or defending commercial (usually uninsured operating) claims.
 
Not all risks are insured and not all risks are insurable. The principal insurable risks which nevertheless remain uninsured across the fleet are loss of hire and strikes. We do not insure these risks because the costs are regarded as disproportionate to the benefit.
 
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our insurance coverage as of December 31, 2010.

Type
Aggregate Sum Insured For All Vessels in our Existing Fleet*
   
Hull and Machinery
$861.24 million (increased value insurance (including excess liabilities) provides additional coverage).
Increased Value (including Excess Liabilities)
Up to $373.56 million additional coverage in total.
Protection and Indemnity (P&I)
Pollution liability claims: limited to $1.0 billion per vessel per incident.
War Risk
$1.2 billion
*Certain of our bareboat charterers are responsible for the insurance on the vessels. The values attributed to those vessels are in line with the values agreed in the relevant charters as augmented by separate insurances.
 
The International Product Tanker Industry
 
The international seaborne transportation industry represents the most cost effective method of transporting large volumes of crude oil and refined petroleum products. The seaborne movement of refined petroleum products between regions addresses demand and supply imbalances for such products caused by the lack of resources or refining capacity in consuming countries. Global demand for the shipping of refined products and crude oil has grown historically at a faster rate than the demand for the refined products and the crude oil themselves. However, in 2008 and 2009, oil demand has contracted sharply as a result of the global economic slowdown. The demand for product and crude oil tankers is cyclical and a function of several factors, including the general strength of the economy, location of oil production and the distance from refineries as well as refining and consumption and world oil demand and supply. As a consequence of the deterioration in the global oil products demand, the demand for product tankers has deteriorated from the second quarter of 2009 onwards. While global oil demand returned to growth in 2010, the product tanker market experienced a more limited improvement, as the supply of product tankers remained at historically high numbers and refined product inventories remained high.
 
According to the International Energy Agency (the “IEA”), global oil product demand for 2010 has been revised as of 10th December 2010 to 87.4 mb/day compared to 84.9 mb/day during 2009. The IEA expects 2011 oil demand to grow by 1.5% to 88.8 mb/day. Growth is expected to be driven by non-OECD countries, most notably in Asia. Due to increasing environmental restrictions on the building of refineries in the countries that belong to the OECD, additional refineries are expected to continue to be built at locations far from such points of consumption, resulting in refined product tankers being required to travel longer distances on each voyage. The global economic slowdown and the crisis in the financial markets resulted in a weak refining margins environment  throughout 2010. A continued weakness in the refining industry might continue to adversely affect seaborne product trade, as well as plans to build new refineries or expand existing refining capacity.  
 
Competition
 
We operate in a highly fragmented, highly diversified global market with many charterers, owners and operators of vessels.
 
 
 
 
Competition for charters can be intense and the ability to obtain favorable charters depends, in addition to price, on a variety of other factors, including the location, size, age, condition and acceptability of the vessel and its operator to the charterer and is frequently tied to having an available vessel which has met the strict operational and financial standards established by the oil major companies to pre-qualify or vet tanker operators prior to entering into charters with them. Although we believe that at the present time no single company has a dominant position in the markets in which we compete, that could change and we may face substantial competition for medium to long-term charters from a number of experienced companies who may have greater resources or experience than we do when we try to recharter our vessels, especially as a large number of our vessels will come off charter during 2011. However, Capital Maritime is among a small number of ship management companies that has undergone and successfully completed audits by six major international oil companies in the last few years, including audits with BP p.l.c., Chevron Corporation, ExxonMobil Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell plc, StatoilHydro ASA, and Total S.A. We believe our ability to comply with the rigorous standards of major oil companies, relative to less qualified or experienced operators, allows us to effectively compete for new charters.
 
Regulation
 
General
 
Our operations and our status as an operator and manager of ships are significantly regulated by international conventions, Class requirements, U.S. federal, state and local and foreign health, safety and environmental protection laws and regulations, including OPA 90, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the U.S. Port and Tanker Safety Act, the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, the U.S. Clean Air Act (“Clean Air Act”), as well as regulations adopted by the IMO and the European Union, various volatile organic compound air emission requirements, IMO/U.S. Coast Guard pollution regulations and various Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) amendments, as well as other regulations described below. In addition, various jurisdictions either have or are considering regulating the management of ballast water to prevent the introduction of non-indigenous species considered to be invasive. Compliance with these laws, regulations and other requirements could entail additional expense, including vessel modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures.
 
We are also required by various other governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for our vessels, depending upon such factors as the country of registry, the commodity transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessels crew, the age and size of the vessel and our status as owner or charterer. Failure to maintain necessary permits, licenses or certificates could require us to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operations of one or more of our vessels.
 
We believe that the heightened environmental and quality concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will in the future impose greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels in the shipping industry. In addition to inspections by us, our vessels are subject to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections by a variety of governmental and private entities, each of which may have unique requirements. These entities include the local port authorities (such as U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administration P&I Clubs, charterers, and particularly terminal operators and major oil companies which conduct frequent vessel inspections.
 
Our vessels operate in full compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, because such laws and regulations frequently change and may impose increasingly strict requirements, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with these and any future requirements or the impact of these and any future requirements on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels.
 
United States Requirements
 
The United States regulates the tanker industry with an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection and the cleanup of oil spills, primarily through OPA 90 and CERCLA.
 
OPA 90 affects all vessel owners and operators shipping oil or petroleum products to, from, or within U.S. waters. The law phases out the use of tankers having single-hulls and can effectively impose unlimited liability on vessel owners and operators in the event of an oil spill. Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are liable, without regard to fault, for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages, including natural resource damages and economic loss without physical damage to property, arising from oil spills and pollution from their vessels. Effective July 31, 2009, the U.S. Coast Guard adopted interim regulations that adjusted the limits of OPA liability for double-hull vessels to the greater of $2,000 per gross ton or $17,088,000 million per tanker that is over 3,000 gross tons (subject to possible adjustment for inflation), unless the incident was caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct, or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability was unlimited. In addition, OPA 90 does not preempt state law and permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries. Coastal states have enacted pollution prevention, liability and response laws, many providing for unlimited liability. As a result of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico resulting from the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, bills have been introduced in both houses of the U.S. Congress to increase the limits of OPA liability for all vessels, including tanker vessels.
 
 
 
 
CERCLA, which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances (other than oil) whether on land or at sea, contains a similar liability regime and provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource damages. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5.0 million for vessels carrying any hazardous substances as cargo, or $0.5 million for any other vessel, per release of or incident involving hazardous substances. These limits of liability do not apply if the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct, or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is unlimited.
 
The financial responsibility regulations for tankers issued under OPA 90 also require owners and operators of vessels entering U.S. waters to obtain, and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard, Certificates of Financial Responsibility, or COFRs, in the amount sufficient to meet the maximum aggregate liability under OPA 90 and CERCLA. All of our vessels that need COFRs have them.
 
We insure each of our tankers with pollution liability insurance in the maximum commercially available amount of $1.0 billion per incident. A catastrophic spill could exceed the insurance coverage available, in which event there could be a material adverse effect on our business. OPA 90 requires that tankers over 5,000 gross ton calling at U.S. ports have double hulls if contracted after June 30, 1990 or delivered after January 1, 1994. Furthermore, OPA 90 calls for the phase-out of all single hull tankers by the year 2015 according to a schedule that is based on the size and age of the vessel, unless the tankers are retrofitted with double-hulls. All of the vessels in our fleet have double hulls.
 
We believe that we are in compliance with OPA 90, CERCLA and all applicable state regulations in U.S. ports where our vessels call.
 
OPA 90 also amended the Clean Water Act to require owners and operators of vessels to adopt contingency plans for reporting and responding to oil spill scenarios up to a worst case scenario and to identify and ensure, through contracts or other approved means, the availability of necessary private response resources to respond to a worst case discharge. In addition, periodic training programs and drills for shore and response personnel and for vessels and their crews are required. Our vessel response plans have been approved by the U.S. Coast Guard. The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for unauthorized discharges. The Clean Water Act also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the more recent OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed herein. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) regulates the discharge into U.S. waters of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels. Under the EPA, commercial vessels greater than 79 feet in length are required to obtain coverage under the Vessel General Permit, or VGP, by submitting a Notice of Intent. The VGP incorporates current U.S. Coast Guard requirements for ballast water management as well as supplemental ballast water requirements and includes technology-based and water-quality based limits for other discharges, such as deck runoff, bilge water and gray water. Administrative provisions, such as monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, are also included. We have submitted NOIs for our vessels operating in U.S. waters and will likely incur costs to meet the requirements of the VGP. In addition, various states, such as Michigan and California, have also enacted, or proposed, legislation restricting ballast water discharges and the introduction of non-indigenous species considered to be invasive. These and any similar restrictions enacted in the future could include ballast water treatment obligations that could increase the cost of operating in the United States. For example, this could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial cost and/or otherwise restrict our vessels from entering certain U.S. waters.
 
The Clean Air Act (or CAA) requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. The Clean Air Act also requires states to draft State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) designed to attain national health-based air quality standards in primarily major metropolitan and/or industrial areas. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations by requiring the installation of vapor control equipment. Individual states, including California, have also attempted to regulate vessel emissions within state waters. California also has adopted fuel content regulations that will apply to all vessels sailing within 24 miles of the California coastline and whose itineraries call for them to enter any California ports, terminal facilities, or internal or estuarine waters. In addition, on March 26, 2010, IMO designated the area extending 200 miles from the U.S. territorial sea baseline adjacent to the Atlantic/Gulf and Pacific coasts and the eight main Hawaiian Islands as Emission Control Areas under recent amendments to the Annex VI of MARPOL (discussed below).  These or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by EPA or the states where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
 
 
 
 
International Requirements
 
The IMO has also negotiated international conventions that impose liability for oil pollution in international waters and a signatorys territorial waters. In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships to address air pollution from ships. Annex VI, which became effective in May 2005, sets limits on sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulphur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on sulphur emissions. The MEPC adopted amendments to Annex VI to the MARPOL, which entered into force on July 1, 2010, regarding particulate matter, nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide emissions. The revised Annex VI reduces air pollution from vessels by, among other things (i) implementing a progressive reduction of sulfur oxide emissions from ships, with the global sulfur cap reduced initially to 3.50% (from the current cap of 4.50%), effective from January 1, 2012, then progressively to 0.50%, effective from January 1, 2020, subject to a feasibility review to be completed no later than 2018; and (ii) establishing new tiers of stringent nitrogen oxide emissions standards for new marine engines, depending on their date of installation. Additionally, more stringent emission standards could apply in coastal areas designated as Emission Control Areas.. We may incur additional costs to comply with these revised standards. A failure to comply with Annex VI requirements could result in a vessel not being able to operate. All of our vessels are subject to Annex VI regulations. We believe that our existing vessels meet relevant Annex VI requirements and that our undelivered product tankers will be fitted with these emission control systems prior to their delivery.
 
The ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO, also requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies. The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety management certificate for each vessel they operate. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its manager has been awarded a document of compliance, issued by each flag state, under the ISM Code. All of our ocean going vessels are ISM certified.
 
Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMO regulations may subject the shipowner or bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. For example, the U.S. Coast Guard and EU authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited from trading in U.S. and EU ports.
 
Many countries have ratified and follow the liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969 (the CLC) (the United States, with its separate OPA 90 regime, is not a party to the CLC). Under this convention and depending on whether the country in which the damage results is a party to the 1992 Protocol to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, a vessels registered owner is strictly liable for pollution damage caused in the territorial waters of a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to certain defenses. Under an amendment to the Protocol that became effective on November 1, 2003, for vessels of 5,000 to 140,000 gross tons, liability will be limited to approximately $7.1 million plus $989.2 for each additional gross ton over 5,000. For vessels of over 140,000 gross tons, liability will be limited to approximately $140.7 million. As the convention calculates liability in terms of a basket of currencies, these figures are based on currency exchange rates on December 31, 2010. The right to limit liability is forfeited under the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage where the spill is caused by the owners actual fault and under the 1992 Protocol where the spill is caused by the owners intentional or reckless conduct. Vessels trading to states that are parties to these conventions must provide evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner. In jurisdictions where the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law regimes govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to that convention. We believe that our P&I insurance will cover the liability under the plan adopted by the IMO.
 
In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, which imposes strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker oil. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain size to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended). The Bunker Convention entered into force on November 21, 2008. We have made relevant arrangements and our entire fleet has been issued with a certificate attesting that insurance is in force in accordance with the insurance provisions of the convention.
 
IMO regulations also require owners and operators of vessels to adopt Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans (SMPEPs). Periodic training and drills for response personnel and for vessels and their crews are required. The SMPEPs required for our vessels are in place.
 
 
 
 
In addition, our operations are subject to compliance with the International Bulk Chemical (IBC) Code, as required by MARPOL and SOLAS for chemical tankers built after July 1, 1986, which provides ship design, construction and equipment requirements and other standards for the bulk transport of certain liquid chemicals. Under October 2004 amendments to the IBC Code (implemented to meet recent revisions to SOLAS and Annex II to MARPOL), some previously unrestricted vegetable oils, including animal fats and marine oils, must be transported in chemical tankers meeting certain double-hull construction requirements. Our vessels may transport such cargoes but are restricted as to the volume they are able to transport per cargo tank. This restriction does not apply to edible oils. In addition, those amendments require re-evaluation of the categorization of certain products with respect to their properties as marine pollutants, as well as related ship type and carriage requirements. Where necessary pollution data is not supplied for those products missing such data, it is possible that the bulk carriage of such products will be prohibited.
 
In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships (the “Anti-fouling Convention”) which prohibits the use of organotin compound coatings to prevent the attachment of mollusks and other sea life to the hulls of vessels. The Anti-fouling Convention came into force on September 17, 2008 and applies to vessels constructed prior to January 1, 2003 that have not been in drydock since that date. The effective date of the Anti-fouling Convention was January 1, 2008. Vessels of over 400 gross tons engaged in international voyages must obtain an International Anti-fouling System Certificate and must undergo a survey before the vessel is put into service or when the anti-fouling systems are altered or replaced. We have obtained Anti-Fouling System Certificates for all of our vessels that are subject to the Anti-Fouling Convention and do not believe that maintaining such certificates will have an adverse financial impact on the operation of our vessels.
 
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
 
In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or Kyoto Protocol, entered into force. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases, which are suspected of contributing to global warming. Currently, the emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol. However, a new treaty may be adopted in the future that includes restrictions on shipping emissions. The European Union also has indicated that it intends to propose an expansion of the existing European Union emissions trading scheme to include emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels. In the United States, the EPA is considering a petition from the California Attorney General to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going vessels. In addition, climate change initiatives are being considered in the U.S. Congress. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, European Union, the U.S. or other countries where we operate that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases could have a financial impact on our operations that we cannot predict with certainty at this time.
 
Vessel Security Regulations
 
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
 
Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter went into effect in July 2004, and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port Facilities Security (ISPS) Code. Among the various requirements are:
 
on-board installation of automatic identification systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications;
 
on-board installation of ship security alert systems;
 
the development of vessel security plans; and
 
compliance with flag state security certification requirements.
 
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempted non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such vessels had on board, by July 1, 2004, a valid International Ship Security Certificate that attests to the vessels compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We have implemented the various security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and have ensured that our vessels are compliant with all applicable security requirements.

 
 
 
C.   Organizational Structure



Please also see Exhibit 8.1 to this Annual Report for a list of our significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010.

 
D.    Property, Plants and Equipment
 
Other than our vessels, we do not have any material property. Our obligations under our credit facilities are secured by all our vessels. For further details regarding our credit facilities, please see “Item 5B: Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowings—Revolving Credit Facilities”.
 
Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
 
None.
 
 
 
 
Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
 
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our audited consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Among other things, the Financial Statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the following information. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are presented in thousands of U.S. Dollars.
 
A.    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Overview
 
We are an international owner of product tankers formed in January 2007 by Capital Maritime, an international shipping company with a long history of operating and investing in the shipping market. Our fleet currently consists of 21 double-hull, high specification tankers with an average age of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011. Eight of our vessels were transferred to us by Capital Maritime at the time of our IPO in April 2007. At the time of the IPO we also entered into an agreement to acquire seven newbuildings from Capital Maritime at fixed prices which were delivered during 2007 and 2008. During 2007 and 2008, we also acquired three additional vessels from Capital Maritime which we had not agreed to purchase at the time of our IPO, two of which were purchased in part by issuing equity to Capital Maritime. In April 2009, we acquired two additional vessels from Capital Maritime’s fleet, which had been identified under our omnibus agreement with Capital Maritime, in exchange for one vessel from our IPO fleet and one of the seven newbuildings purchased subsequently. During 2010 we acquired an additional three vessels from Capital Maritime, two of which had been previously sold to Capital Maritime and which were purchased by issuing additional equity under our Form F-3 Registration Statement. As of January 31, 2011, Capital Maritime owned a 31.2% interest in us, including 11,304,651 common units and a 2% interest in us through its ownership of our general partner.
 
 
Notwithstanding the recent global economic downturn and the recent partial recovery, the likely strength and duration of which it is not possible to predict, our primary business objective is to pay a sustainable quarterly distribution per unit and to increase our distributions over time, subject to shipping, charter and financial market developments. Our strategy focuses on maintaining and growing our cash flows, continuing to grow our fleet and maintaining and building on our ability to meet rigorous industry and regulatory safety standards. We believe that the combination of the medium to long-term nature of our charters and our agreement with Capital Ship Management for the commercial and technical management of our vessels, which provides for a fixed management fee for an initial term of approximately five years from when we take delivery of each vessel, and the fact that we currently have no capital commitments to purchase or build further vessels is likely to provide us with a base of stable cash flows in the medium term. As our vessels come up for rechartering we will seek to redeploy them at contracts that reflect our expectations of the market conditions prevailing at the time. We intend to continue to evaluate potential opportunities to acquire both newbuildings and second-hand vessels from Capital Maritime and from third parties (including, potentially, through the acquisition of, or combination with, other shipping businesses) and leverage the expertise and reputation of Capital Maritime in a prudent manner that is accretive to our unitholders and to long-term distribution growth, subject to approval of our board of directors and overall market conditions.

Please see “Factors Affecting our Future Results of Operations” below.

Please also see Item 4B: Business Overview” above, for a description of the historical development of our company and a description of the significant acquisitions and financial events to date and “Item 4B: Business Overview—Our Fleet for more information regarding our vessels, including dates of acquisition and acquisition prices and information on their charters,  “Item 5B: Liquidity and Capital Resources—Net Cash Used in Investing Activities” and Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein for more information regarding any acquisitions, including a detailed explanation of how they were accounted for  and “Item 7B: Related-Party Transactions” for a description of the terms of certain transactions.
 
Our Charters
 
We generate revenues by charging our customers for the use of our vessels to transport their products. Historically, we have provided services to our customers under time or bareboat charter agreements. Currently, 19 of the 21 vessels in our fleet are under medium to long-term time or bareboat charters with an average remaining term of approximately 4.6 years as of January 31, 2011. Currently, 69% of the fleet total days in 2011 are secured under period charter coverage. In addition, of our 11 time charters, 9 contain profit-sharing arrangements. Two of our vessels are currently trading in the spot market. We may in the future operate additional vessels in the spot market until the vessels have been chartered under appropriate medium to long-term charters.
 
Our time chartered vessels are under contracts with BP Shipping Limited, Capital Maritime, Petrobras, Arrendadora and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. BP Shipping Limited, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc accounted for 49%, 11% and 11% of our revenues respectively for the year ended December 31, 2010. BP Shipping Limited, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. and subsidiaries of Overseas Shipholding Group Inc accounted for 54%, 20% and 11% of our revenues respectively for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 48%, 29% and 0% respectively for the year ended December 31, 2008. The loss of any significant customer or a substantial decline in the amount of services requested by a significant customer could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the future, as our fleet expands, we also expect to enter into charters with new charterers in order to maintain a portfolio that is diverse from a customer, geographic and maturity perspective.
 
 
 
 
Please read Item 4B: Business Overview—Our Fleet, —Our Charters and —Profit Sharing Arrangements for additional details regarding these types of contractual relationships as well as a detailed description of the length and daily charter rate of our charters and information regarding the calculation of our profit share arrangements.
 
Accounting for Acquisition and Disposal of Vessels
 
Following the annual general meeting of common unitholders on July 22, 2010, and the election of two Class III directors by non-Capital Maritime unitholders, the majority of our board of directors has been elected by non-Capital Maritime controlled unitholders. As a result, we are not considered to be under common control with Capital Maritime. As a result, since July 22, 2010, we no longer accounted for vessel acquisitions from Capital Maritime as transfer of equity interest between entities under common control.
 
All vessels we acquired from Capital Maritime prior to July 22, 2010, were transferred to us at historical cost and accounted for as a combination of entities under common control or a transfer of equity interest between entities under common control. All assets, liabilities and equity, other than the relevant vessel, related charter agreement and related permits, of these vessels’ ship-owning companies were retained by Capital Maritime.
 
 
Vessels that had an operating history as part of Capital Maritime’s fleet, prior to their acquisition by us have been treated as an acquisition of business. As a result, transfers of equity interests between entities under common control were accounted for as if the transfer occurred at the beginning of the period, and prior years were retroactively adjusted to furnish comparative information similar to the pooling method.
 
 
Vessels that had no operating history and were delivered to us from the shipyards through Capital Maritime have been treated as an acquisition of assets from an entity under common control.
 
During 2009 we exchanged with Capital Maritime the vessel owning company of the M/T Assos for the vessel owning company of the M/T Agamemnon and the vessel owning company of the M/T Atrotos for the M/T Ayrton II. Following the accounting guidance for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets we deconsolidated from our Financial Statements as of the date of the transfer to Capital Maritime the vessel-owning companies of the M/T Assos and the M/T Atrotos.  Results of operations, cash flows, and balances of these vessels prior to their transfer to Capital Maritime are included in our Financial Statements.
 
For detailed information on how we have accounted for the transfers of vessels please see Note 1 (Basis of Presentation and General Information) to our Financial Statements included herein.
 
Factors Affecting Our Future Results of Operations
 
We believe the principal factors that will affect our future results of operations are the economic, regulatory, financial, credit, political and governmental conditions that affect the shipping industry generally and that affect conditions in countries and markets in which our vessels engage in business. The world economy experienced a major global economic slowdown during 2008-2009 as well as a severe deterioration in the banking and credit markets which had a negative impact on world trade and which may affect our ability to obtain financing as well as further impact the values of our vessels and the charters we are able to obtain for our vessels. The pace of recovery of the world economy and demand for oil and oil products and the deliveries of newbuilding vessels will affect the shipping industry in general and our future results.  Other key factors that will be fundamental to our business, future financial condition and results of operations include:
 
 
the demand for seaborne transportation services;
 
 
levels of oil product demand and inventories;
 
 
charter hire levels and our ability to recharter our vessels as their current charters expire;
 
 
our ability to service our debt and, when the non-amortizing period expires in as early as June 2012, to refinance our existing indebtedness or, in the event such indebtedness is not refinanced, our obligation to make principal payments under our credit facilities starting in September 2012;
 
 
 
 
 
supply of product and crude oil tankers and specifically the number of newbuildings entering the world tanker fleet each year;
 
 
the ability to increase the size of our fleet and make additional acquisitions that are accretive to our unitholders;
 
 
the ability of Capital Maritimes commercial and chartering operations to successfully employ our vessels at economically attractive rates, particularly as our fleet expands and our charters expire;
 
 
our ability to benefit from new maritime regulations concerning the phase-out of single-hull vessels and the more restrictive regulations for the transport of certain products and cargoes;
 
 
our ability to comply with the covenants in our credit facilities, including covenants relating to the maintenance of asset value ratios;
 
 
the increased costs associated the renewal of our technical management agreement;
 
 
the effective and efficient technical management of our vessels;
 
 
Capital Maritimes ability to obtain and maintain major international oil company approvals and to satisfy their technical, health, safety and compliance standards; and
 
 
the strength of and growth in the number of our customer relationships, especially with major international oil companies and major commodity traders.
 
In addition to the factors discussed above, we believe certain specific factors have impacted, and will continue to impact, our results of operations. These factors include:
 
 
the charterhire earned by our vessels under time charters and bareboat charters;
 
 
our ability to recharter our vessels on medium to long term charters at competitive rates;
 
 
our ability to comply with the covenants in our credit facilities,  including covenants relating to the maintenance of asset value ratios, as the recent decline in asset values and charter rates may limit our ability to pursue our business strategy;
 
 
the prevailing spot market rates and the number of our vessels which we operate on the spot market;
 
 
our access to debt, and equity and the cost of such capital, required to acquire additional vessels and/or to implement our business strategy;
 
 
our ability to sell vessels at prices we deem satisfactory;
 
 
our level of debt and the related interest expense and amortization of principal; and
 
 
the level of any distribution on our common units.
 
Please read Risk Factors above for a discussion of certain risks inherent in our business.
 
Factors to Consider When Evaluating Our Results
 
We believe it is important to consider the following factors when evaluating our results of operations:
 
 
Financial Statements. Our Financial Statements include the results of operations of different numbers of vessels in each year and have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the results of operations of all non-contracted vessels we acquired prior to July 22, 2010, as if they were owned by us for the entire period from their delivery to Capital Maritime (with the exception of the M/T Assos for the period from April 7, 2009 to August 15, 2010). In certain cases, the Financial Statements have also been adjusted to reflect financial position and cash-flow items prior to delivery of the relevant vessel to Capital Maritime for acquisitions we made prior to July 22, 2010. In addition, the vessel-owning companies of the M/T Assos and the M/T Atrotos were deconsolidated from our accounts as of the date of the transfer to Capital Maritime in April 2009. Results of operations, cash flows, and balances of these vessels prior to their transfer to Capital Maritime were included in our consolidated financial statements. Please read Note 1 of our Financial Statements included herein for a description of the financial treatment of vessel acquisitions and dispositions.
 
 
Vessel Acquisitions and Disposals. Vessels that have been acquired or delivered to us prior to July 22, 2010, are included in our results of operations, cash flows and financial position from the date of incorporation of the relevant vessel-owning company or, in the case of the seven vessels we contracted to acquire at the time of our IPO which were delivered during 2007 and 2008, as of their delivery date from the shipyard to Capital Maritime and us. Results of operations, cash flows and financial position of vessels that have been disposed of are included in our Financial Statements up to the date of their disposal. As a result of this accounting treatment, our Financial Statements may include results of operations of more vessels than actually comprised our fleet during the relevant year. Please read —Accounting for Acquisition and Disposal of Vessels above and Note 1 of our Financial Statements included herein for a description of the financial treatment of vessel acquisitions. The table below shows the periods for which the results of operations and cash flows for each vessel-owning subsidiary are included in our Financial Statements.
 
 
 
 
VESSEL INCLUSION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
       
Vessel included in Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31,
Vessel
 
Incorporation date of VOC*
Date acquired
by Capital Maritime
Date acquired
by us
2010
2009
2008
M/T Atlantas (1)
09/16/2003
04/26/2006
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Assos (1), (2), (3)
03/18/2004
05/17/2006
04/04/2007
Since Aug 16
Up to April 6
X
M/T Aktoras (1)
08/27/2003
07/12/2006
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Agisilaos (1)
10/10/2003
08/16/2006
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Arionas (1)
11/10/2003
11/02/2006
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Avax (1)
02/10/2004
01/12/2007
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Aiolos (1)
09/12/2003
03/02/2007
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T Axios (1)
02/10/2004
02/28/2007
04/04/2007
X
X
X
M/T  Atrotos (4), (5), (3)#
02/11/2004
05/08/2007
05/08/2007
Since Mar 1
Up to April 12
X
M/T Akeraios (4)
02/03/2004
07/13/2007
07/13/2007
X
X
X
M/T Apostolos (4)
05/26/2004
09/20/2007
09/20/2007
X
X
X
M/T Anemos I (4)
07/08/2004
09/28/2007
09/28/2007
X
X
X
M/T Attikos (6)
12/29/2003
01/20/2005
09/24/2007
X
X
X
M/T Alexandros II (4)
02/07/2006
01/29/2008
01/29/2008
X
X
X
M/T Amore Mio II (6)
05/29/2007
07/31/2007
03/27/2008
X
X
X
M/T Aristofanis (6)
02/03/2004
06/02/2005
04/30/2008
X
X
X
M/T Aristotelis II (4)
02/07/2006
06/17/2008